Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,269,436 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.541. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.576% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 576.1 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $40,434, a difference of 25.9%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $51,594, a difference of 19.1%), and median family income ($114,826 compared to $97,222, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $52,450, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $38,833, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $57,580, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 34.2%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 4.1%), single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 38.3%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 31.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 2.5%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 34.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 21.1%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 88.5%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 60.2%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 55.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.4%).