Immigrants from Latvia vs Norwegian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,522,214 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.646. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.890% in Norwegians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 889.8 Norwegians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $44,480, a difference of 14.5%), median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $38,802, a difference of 11.1%), and median earnings ($51,555 compared to $46,865, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $53,127, a difference of 2.7%), householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $61,104, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,454 compared to $103,682, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.65%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 25.1%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 25.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 24.5%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.23%), births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.08, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 87.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 45.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 37.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 39.4%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 37.5%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Norwegian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.5%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.3%).