Immigrants from Latvia vs Mongolian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,937,796 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.615. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.755% in Mongolians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 755.5 Mongolians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $49,173, a difference of 3.5%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $60,350, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $65,326, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,454 compared to $111,602, a difference of 0.13%), median family income ($114,826 compared to $114,553, a difference of 0.24%), and median household income ($93,602 compared to $93,971, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.1%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.2%), and poverty (11.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.0%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (25.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 6.7%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.64%), currently married (46.7% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and family households (62.0% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.8%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and professional degree (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Mongolian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.3%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.75%).