Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,304,403 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Immigrant from Sri Lanka communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.713. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sri Lanka within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.284% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sri Lanka corresponds to an increase of 283.7 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,555 compared to $55,082, a difference of 9.0%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and median male earnings ($63,099 compared to $66,125, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,094 compared to $118,932, a difference of 0.14%), median household income ($99,943 compared to $100,306, a difference of 0.36%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,426 compared to $69,703, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in single mother poverty (26.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 8.1%), single female poverty (18.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.38%), poverty (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.76%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 6.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 6.4%), divorced or separated (10.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.1% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.050%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.4%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.61%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 1.7%).