Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,822,250 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.448. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 9.6 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,412 compared to $53,359, a difference of 25.8%), householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $69,774, a difference of 24.8%), and median family income ($100,984 compared to $122,764, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $55,932, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $45,323, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 58.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 32.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 3.7%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and male poverty (11.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 30.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.9%), births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 36.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (65.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.6%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.37%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 84.2%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 79.4%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 66.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 31.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.0%).