Immigrants from Portugal vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,735,010 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.216. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 18.5 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $64,416, a difference of 15.2%), per capita income ($42,412 compared to $45,220, a difference of 6.6%), and median family income ($100,984 compared to $106,453, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,304 compared to $47,617, a difference of 0.66%), householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $53,680, a difference of 0.79%), and median male earnings ($55,182 compared to $55,712, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.40%), male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 19.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.62%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 18.3%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.5%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.020%), family households (65.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.49%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.5%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.3%), and no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%), 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 54.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 0.24%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.0%).