Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Mexican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,379,216 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Mexicans within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.606. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.277% in Mexicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 276.8 Mexicans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,660 compared to $34,559, a difference of 52.4%), median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $46,147, a difference of 49.4%), and median family income ($125,956 compared to $85,618, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 12.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $49,989, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $53,897, a difference of 30.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 66.6%), receiving food stamps (8.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 65.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 11.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 26.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 51.4%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 49.6%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 3.9%), family households with children (30.0% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple households (50.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 46.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 27.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 124.4%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 114.6%), and master's degree (20.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 113.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 41.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 40.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 9.0%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and female disability (10.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 18.5%).