Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Austrian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 408,349,236 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Austrians within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Austrians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Austrians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $59,359, a difference of 16.2%), median household income ($106,057 compared to $91,339, a difference of 16.1%), and median earnings ($57,114 compared to $49,501, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $64,470, a difference of 8.7%), and per capita income ($52,660 compared to $48,116, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 21.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.33%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 16.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 14.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 25.8%), divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (50.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.7%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (66.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.19%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.1%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 23.8%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.10%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and 11th grade (93.6% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Austrian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 40.3%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 30.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.070%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 8.5%).