Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Immigrants from Northern Europe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Immigrants from Northern Europe
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,913
SOCIAL INDEX
86.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
38th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Northern Europe Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 432,013,652 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Northern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Immigrants from Northern Europe.
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($106,057 compared to $99,813, a difference of 6.3%), median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $64,987, a difference of 6.1%), and median earnings ($57,114 compared to $53,872, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $69,003, a difference of 1.6%), per capita income ($52,660 compared to $54,159, a difference of 2.9%), and wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Northern Europe |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,660 | Exceptional $54,159 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,956 | Exceptional $121,840 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $106,057 | Exceptional $99,813 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $57,114 | Exceptional $53,872 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $68,960 | Exceptional $64,987 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,324 | Exceptional $44,366 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,818 | Exceptional $54,571 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $116,626 | Exceptional $111,676 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $124,188 | Exceptional $117,930 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $70,103 | Exceptional $69,003 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.3% | Tragic 28.5% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (10.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 14.7%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.69%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Northern Europe |
| Poverty | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.6% | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 13.6% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 13.8% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Excellent 12.5% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 17.8% | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.5% | Fair 16.5% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.3% | Exceptional 27.3% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Northern Europe |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.5% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Good 17.4% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Poor 10.4% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Average 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.3% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 4.8% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Average 5.4% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Fair 8.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Good 8.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Northern Europe |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 64.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Good 79.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Average 36.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.0% | Fair 74.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 84.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Excellent 83.1% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 16.1%), family households with children (30.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), currently married (50.0% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.0%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Northern Europe |
| Family Households | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 63.8% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.0% | Tragic 26.7% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.6% | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.13 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 50.0% | Exceptional 48.8% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 24.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.88%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Northern Europe |
| No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 10.7% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.5% | Fair 89.5% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.6% | Good 56.1% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Average 19.5% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Fair 6.2% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 19.6%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and bachelor's degree (48.3% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.4% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Northern Europe |
| No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.7% |
| Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
| Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.4% |
| 1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
| 2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.3% |
| 3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 5th Grade | Good 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
| 6th Grade | Good 97.2% | Exceptional 97.7% |
| 7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 96.9% |
| 8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 96.0% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Exceptional 95.2% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 94.2% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 93.1% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Exceptional 91.4% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.4% | Exceptional 88.5% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 72.1% | Exceptional 71.1% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.7% | Exceptional 53.5% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.3% | Exceptional 45.6% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.7% | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Northern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 28.8%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 23.1%), and male disability (9.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Northern Europe |
| Disability | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Good 11.1% |
| Females | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Tragic 1.3% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Good 6.5% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.9% | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.6% | Exceptional 21.0% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.0% | Exceptional 45.2% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.3% |