Latvian vs Armenian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,372,529 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.072% in Armenians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 71.6 Armenians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 12.5%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $109,692, a difference of 9.7%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $58,134, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $53,179, a difference of 0.75%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $42,212, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $103,248, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 41.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 31.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.29%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.4%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 5.8%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.11%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.99%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.3%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 59.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.9%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Armenian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 48.3%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 27.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.3%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.1%).