Latvian vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,643,956 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.764. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.415% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 415.1 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $41,495, a difference of 26.9%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $97,958, a difference of 22.8%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $53,704, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $55,543, a difference of 5.2%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 9.9%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $39,376, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 43.8%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.65%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.77%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 34.0%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.97%), currently married (48.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 53.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 36.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.21%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 114.3%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 102.8%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 77.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 35.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 30.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.4%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.9%).