Latvian vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,017,505 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.256. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.349% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 349.3 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $57,003, a difference of 8.0%), per capita income ($52,649 compared to $50,057, a difference of 5.2%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $101,681, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($120,301 compared to $119,955, a difference of 0.29%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $63,827, a difference of 0.52%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $53,690, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.5%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (13.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 1.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (26.4% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 9.9%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and family households (62.8% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.13%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.5%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.83%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 55.6%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.4%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%).