Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Chile Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 170,964,420 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.793. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.113% in Immigrants from Chile. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 113.0 Immigrants from Chile.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $46,213, a difference of 23.5%), median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $55,954, a difference of 16.6%), and median family income ($90,918 compared to $105,655, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $52,440, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $62,354, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 22.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 22.7%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.5%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.3%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.59%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (67.0% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 38.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 23.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 61.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.3%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Chile communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 18.6%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.5%).