Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Sweden Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,900,911 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from Sweden. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 12.7 Immigrants from Sweden.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $55,582, a difference of 48.6%), median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $65,406, a difference of 36.3%), and median family income ($90,918 compared to $122,765, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $53,621, a difference of 3.5%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $69,722, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 48.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 46.6%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 1.7%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.1%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 35.6%), and births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.8%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households (67.0% compared to 62.5%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 55.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 107.2%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 105.1%), and no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 83.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Sweden communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 24.7%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.76%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.5%).