Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Jordan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,149,573 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.366% in Immigrants from Jordan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 366.1 Immigrants from Jordan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $45,066, a difference of 20.5%), median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $57,145, a difference of 19.1%), and median family income ($90,918 compared to $107,715, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $51,370, a difference of 0.80%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $63,041, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 28.5%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 27.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.3%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.3%), births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 23.4%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.1%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 16.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.46%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 47.2%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Jordan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.5%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.9%).