Mongolian vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,693,143 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ute within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.300% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 300.0 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,173 compared to $36,651, a difference of 34.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $83,937, a difference of 33.0%), and median family income ($114,553 compared to $87,596, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $49,997, a difference of 5.1%), and median female earnings ($42,542 compared to $34,960, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 46.2%), male poverty (11.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 43.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 42.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.6%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 44.4%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.7%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (62.8% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 50.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 25.1%), and no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 65.5%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 52.6%), and bachelor's degree (45.4% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.0% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.040%), 8th grade (95.8% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and 9th grade (95.0% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 33.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 32.1%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.0%).