Swiss vs Portuguese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 392,925,042 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Portuguese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 29.9 Portuguese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.5%), median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $40,177, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $54,436, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $61,440, a difference of 0.30%), per capita income ($44,076 compared to $44,362, a difference of 0.65%), and median male earnings ($55,731 compared to $56,663, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 25.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.7%), male unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.72%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.4%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.12%), family households (65.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.93%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.81%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.0%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Portuguese communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.4%).