Swiss vs Chickasaw Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,990,890 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.819. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.231% in Chickasaw. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 231.4 Chickasaw.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,071 compared to $82,193, a difference of 25.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,511 compared to $77,929, a difference of 22.6%), and median household income ($85,681 compared to $70,005, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $34,414, a difference of 10.1%), wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and median earnings ($46,315 compared to $40,672, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 40.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 35.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.6%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 62.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.2%), family households (65.2% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 59.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 33.2%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.7%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Chickasaw communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 47.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 38.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 6.6%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.2%, a difference of 10.9%).