Swiss vs Native Hawaiian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,387,567 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.442. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Native Hawaiians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 41.8 Native Hawaiians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 17.8%), householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $71,021, a difference of 15.2%), and per capita income ($44,076 compared to $41,017, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,511 compared to $95,058, a difference of 0.48%), median family income ($104,396 compared to $104,910, a difference of 0.49%), and median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $38,461, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 32.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and single father poverty (17.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.1%), male unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 37.4%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.6%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.43, a difference of 8.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.93%), married-couple households (49.9% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.16%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 24.8%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 20.2%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Native Hawaiian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 21.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.15%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.54%).