Ute vs Cuban Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,870,166 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Cubans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 15.2 Cubans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 19.4%), householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $49,152, a difference of 7.7%), and median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $46,580, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $34,942, a difference of 0.050%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $81,483, a difference of 0.84%), and median earnings ($41,051 compared to $40,619, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 47.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 38.8%), and single female poverty (28.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.6%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and family poverty (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 54.5%), male unemployment (6.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 43.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 72.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 19.3%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.4%), currently married (43.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 46.9%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 36.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 0.51%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 46.4%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and associate's degree (38.6% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.0% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.20%), ged/equivalency (81.8% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Cuban communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 33.5%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.37%), female disability (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%).