Ute vs Welsh Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Welsh
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Welsh

Fair
Good
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,335
SOCIAL INDEX
60.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
156th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Welsh Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,368,515 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.471. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.150% in Welsh. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 150.0 Welsh.
Ute Integration in Welsh Communities

Ute vs Welsh Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $100,322, a difference of 19.5%), per capita income ($36,651 compared to $43,233, a difference of 18.0%), and median family income ($87,596 compared to $102,151, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $50,597, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $37,856, a difference of 8.3%).
Ute vs Welsh Income
Income MetricUteWelsh
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Fair
$43,233
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Average
$102,151
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Fair
$83,628
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Fair
$45,710
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Average
$54,647
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Tragic
$37,856
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Tragic
$50,597
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Fair
$93,039
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Average
$100,322
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Average
$60,666
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Tragic
28.9%

Ute vs Welsh Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 54.2%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 49.2%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 3.8%), single male poverty (15.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and single mother poverty (35.7% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 17.6%).
Ute vs Welsh Poverty
Poverty MetricUteWelsh
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Poor
14.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Average
17.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Excellent
15.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Excellent
15.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Excellent
15.6%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
30.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.3%

Ute vs Welsh Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 49.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 46.3%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.8%).
Ute vs Welsh Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteWelsh
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.1%

Ute vs Welsh Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 13.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 5.1%).
Ute vs Welsh Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteWelsh
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Tragic
64.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
42.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Tragic
82.3%

Ute vs Welsh Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.1%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.0%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.12, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.40%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 3.0%).
Ute vs Welsh Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteWelsh
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Excellent
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Exceptional
48.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
12.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Fair
32.0%

Ute vs Welsh Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 62.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.42%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 7.5%).
Ute vs Welsh Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteWelsh
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
7.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
93.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
60.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
7.5%

Ute vs Welsh Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.0%), master's degree (11.7% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 24.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.43%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.69%).
Ute vs Welsh Education Level
Education Level MetricUteWelsh
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.7%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Exceptional
98.5%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Exceptional
97.2%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
94.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
87.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Good
66.0%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Average
59.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Fair
45.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Fair
37.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Fair
4.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
1.9%

Ute vs Welsh Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Welsh communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 89.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.34%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.6%).
Ute vs Welsh Disability
Disability MetricUteWelsh
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
12.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Fair
23.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Excellent
47.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Average
2.5%