Ute vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,526,159 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.325. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.034% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to a decrease of 33.8 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Asian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $118,426, a difference of 41.1%), median household income ($72,402 compared to $101,681, a difference of 40.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $112,666, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $57,003, a difference of 14.0%), and median female earnings ($34,960 compared to $44,586, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Asian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 68.6%), male poverty (16.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 62.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 42.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 37.4%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (76.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Asian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.1%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 27.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 3.2%), family households (64.3% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.28, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 29.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 0.71%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Asian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 57.4%), bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 44.4%, a difference of 43.6%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.040%), 9th grade (95.0% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and 5th grade (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 42.6%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.2%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.4%).