Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,654,857 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292 and weighted average of 41.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%, a difference of 9.8%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Middle Africa	Chickasaw
Minimum	34.6%	20.0%
Maximum	62.9%	65.4%
Range	28.4%	45.4%
Mean	42.8%	47.8%
Median	41.6%	48.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	38.3%	43.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	45.6%	53.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.4%	10.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.2%	8.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.1%	8.6%

Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Arapaho (41.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (41.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Belize (41.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bahamas (41.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Sudan (41.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
Paiute	0.0 /100 \| #291	Tragic 42.1%
Indonesians	0.0 /100 \| #292	Tragic 42.0%
Menominee	0.0 /100 \| #293	Tragic 42.0%
Immigrants \| Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #294	Tragic 42.0%
Kiowa	0.0 /100 \| #295	Tragic 42.0%
Immigrants \| Sudan	0.0 /100 \| #296	Tragic 41.9%
Arapaho	0.0 /100 \| #297	Tragic 41.8%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	0.0 /100 \| #298	Tragic 41.8%
Immigrants \| Ghana	0.0 /100 \| #299	Tragic 41.8%
Immigrants \| Belize	0.0 /100 \| #300	Tragic 41.8%
Immigrants \| Bahamas	0.0 /100 \| #301	Tragic 41.7%
Immigrants \| Honduras	0.0 /100 \| #302	Tragic 41.6%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.0 /100 \| #303	Tragic 41.6%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.0 /100 \| #304	Tragic 41.6%
Sioux	0.0 /100 \| #305	Tragic 41.5%

Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
South American Indians	28.4 /100 \| #188	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants \| Latvia	26.9 /100 \| #189	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants \| Kuwait	25.6 /100 \| #190	Fair 46.0%
Choctaw	24.9 /100 \| #191	Fair 46.0%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	24.6 /100 \| #192	Fair 46.0%
Taiwanese	23.4 /100 \| #193	Fair 45.9%
Mexican American Indians	23.3 /100 \| #194	Fair 45.9%
Chickasaw	22.7 /100 \| #195	Fair 45.9%
Immigrants \| South America	22.2 /100 \| #196	Fair 45.9%
Cambodians	21.3 /100 \| #197	Fair 45.9%
Ottawa	19.4 /100 \| #198	Poor 45.8%
Carpatho Rusyns	15.7 /100 \| #199	Poor 45.7%
Potawatomi	15.6 /100 \| #200	Poor 45.7%
Immigrants \| Serbia	15.2 /100 \| #201	Poor 45.7%
Immigrants \| Central America	14.2 /100 \| #202	Poor 45.7%