Norwegian vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Norwegian
Chickasaw
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Norwegians
Chickasaw
49.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
22.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,882,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.446 and weighted average of 49.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%, a difference of 7.9%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Norwegian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 24.5% | 20.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 65.4% |
| Range | 75.5% | 45.4% |
| Mean | 54.0% | 47.8% |
| Median | 51.4% | 48.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 48.6% | 43.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.3% | 53.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Norwegians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Scandinavian (49.6%, a difference of 0.050%), European (49.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Asian (49.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Dutch (49.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Czech (49.4%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 49.8% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 49.7% |
| Swedes | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 49.7% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 49.6% |
| English | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 49.6% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 49.6% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 49.6% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 49.5% |
| Asians | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 49.5% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 49.5% |
| Czechs | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 49.4% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 49.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 49.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 49.3% |
| Germans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 49.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
| Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
| Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
| Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
| Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
| Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
| Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
| Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |