Tsimshian vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Chickasaw
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Tsimshian
Chickasaw
48.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
22.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Chickasaw Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.358 and weighted average of 48.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,630 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.197 and weighted average of 45.9%, a difference of 6.2%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 21.2% | 20.0% |
| Maximum | 61.9% | 65.4% |
| Range | 40.7% | 45.4% |
| Mean | 47.0% | 47.8% |
| Median | 48.2% | 48.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 39.3% | 43.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 57.3% | 53.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.0% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 8.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are British (48.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (48.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Indian (Asian) (48.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Welsh (48.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Iran (48.8%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 48.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.6 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 48.8% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.6 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 48.8% |
| Welsh | 99.5 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 48.8% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.5 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 48.8% |
| Tsimshian | 99.5 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| British | 99.5 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.4 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Samoans | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 48.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.3 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Irish | 99.3 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 48.6% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 48.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Taiwanese (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
| Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
| Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
| Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
| Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
| Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
| Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
| Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |