Slavic vs Chinese Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Slavic
Chinese
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Slavs
Chinese
47.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
96.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
50.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Chinese Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,816,374 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140 and weighted average of 47.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 50.4%, a difference of 5.3%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic | Chinese |
Minimum | 18.2% | 35.3% |
Maximum | 82.5% | 63.0% |
Range | 64.3% | 27.8% |
Mean | 53.3% | 50.6% |
Median | 52.1% | 51.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.5% | 46.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 62.2% | 56.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.7% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.7% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.6% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Hawaiian (47.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Africa (47.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Turkish (47.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Italy (47.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Austria (47.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Belgium | 96.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 96.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Latvians | 96.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Immigrants | Austria | 96.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Immigrants | Italy | 96.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Turks | 96.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Slavs | 96.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Hawaiians | 96.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 96.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.5 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Portuguese | 95.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Estonians | 94.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 47.7% |
Immigrants | Japan | 94.4 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 47.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 47.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Pennsylvania German (50.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Pakistan (50.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (50.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Swiss (49.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Korea (49.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 51.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 51.8% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 51.6% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 51.1% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 51.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 50.6% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 50.1% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 49.8% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Swedes | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 49.6% |