Slavic vs Chinese Median Household Income
COMPARE
Slavic
Chinese
Median Household Income
Median Household Income Comparison
Slavs
Chinese
$86,398
MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME
69.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
$98,496
MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Chinese Median Household Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,777,755 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs and median household income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.263 and weighted average of $86,398. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,799,903 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and median household income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027 and weighted average of $98,496, a difference of 14.0%.

Median Household Income Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic | Chinese |
Minimum | $27,389 | $42,222 |
Maximum | $156,479 | $158,665 |
Range | $129,090 | $116,443 |
Mean | $83,350 | $95,906 |
Median | $81,875 | $92,903 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $62,500 | $80,796 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $94,752 | $111,792 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | $32,252 | $30,996 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | $29,906 | $23,711 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | $29,633 | $23,502 |
Similar Demographics by Median Household Income
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Median Household Income
In terms of median household income, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Luxembourger ($86,418, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan ($86,425, a difference of 0.030%), Moroccan ($86,468, a difference of 0.080%), Samoan ($86,498, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Albania ($86,534, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Median Household Income |
Immigrants | Germany | 74.4 /100 | #154 | Good $86,764 |
Carpatho Rusyns | 72.8 /100 | #155 | Good $86,635 |
Immigrants | Albania | 71.5 /100 | #156 | Good $86,534 |
Samoans | 71.0 /100 | #157 | Good $86,498 |
Moroccans | 70.6 /100 | #158 | Good $86,468 |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 70.1 /100 | #159 | Good $86,425 |
Luxembourgers | 70.0 /100 | #160 | Good $86,418 |
Slavs | 69.7 /100 | #161 | Good $86,398 |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.7 /100 | #162 | Good $86,255 |
Czechs | 66.4 /100 | #163 | Good $86,164 |
Irish | 66.2 /100 | #164 | Good $86,145 |
Norwegians | 65.3 /100 | #165 | Good $86,084 |
Scandinavians | 65.1 /100 | #166 | Good $86,073 |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 61.3 /100 | #167 | Good $85,818 |
Icelanders | 61.0 /100 | #168 | Good $85,797 |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Median Household Income
In terms of median household income, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Denmark ($98,510, a difference of 0.010%), Russian ($98,008, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Switzerland ($97,979, a difference of 0.53%), Turkish ($99,389, a difference of 0.91%), and Immigrants from Pakistan ($97,528, a difference of 0.99%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Median Household Income |
Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional $100,306 |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional $100,151 |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional $99,943 |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional $99,933 |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional $99,813 |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional $99,389 |
Immigrants | Denmark | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional $98,510 |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Russians | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional $98,008 |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional $97,979 |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional $97,528 |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional $97,311 |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional $97,297 |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional $97,026 |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional $97,015 |