Slavic vs Chinese Family Poverty
COMPARE
Slavic
Chinese
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Slavs
Chinese
8.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Chinese Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,374,378 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.748 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%, a difference of 24.5%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Chinese |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 33.0% | 19.1% |
| Range | 30.8% | 17.8% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 6.8% |
| Median | 7.3% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 9.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 4.1% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Eastern Europe (8.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Laotian (8.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Indonesia (8.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Norway (8.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and New Zealander (8.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Welsh | 95.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| New Zealanders | 95.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 95.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Slavs | 95.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Laotians | 95.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Egyptians | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| French Canadians | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Basques | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Jordanians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Romanians | 94.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Taiwanese | 94.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |