Afghan vs Zimbabwean Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Afghan
Zimbabwean
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Afghans
Zimbabweans
5.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
11.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
218th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Afghan vs Zimbabwean Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,344,373 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Afghans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,119,087 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 35.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Afghan | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 0.76% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 21.6% | 6.9% |
| Range | 20.8% | 5.9% |
| Mean | 6.4% | 3.4% |
| Median | 5.2% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Afghans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Afghans are Immigrants from Nigeria (5.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Potawatomi (5.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Japanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Armenian (5.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and Iroquois (5.5%, a difference of 0.49%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Nigerians | 14.3 /100 | #211 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 14.0 /100 | #212 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 5.5% |
| Iroquois | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.5% |
| Armenians | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.5% |
| Potawatomi | 12.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 5.5% |
| Afghans | 11.2 /100 | #218 | Poor 5.5% |
| Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Cajuns | 6.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 6.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Sudanese | 6.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 6.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.37%), Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |