Asian vs Zimbabwean Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Asian
Zimbabwean
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Asians
Zimbabweans
4.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
97.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Zimbabwean Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 539,455,145 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.049 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,119,087 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 14.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Asian | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 0.82% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 16.6% | 6.9% |
Range | 15.8% | 5.9% |
Mean | 4.6% | 3.4% |
Median | 4.3% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.1% | 4.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Asians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Immigrants from Romania (4.7%, a difference of 0.29%), Yugoslavian (4.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Western Europe (4.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Europe (4.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and Immigrants from Moldova (4.7%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Portuguese | 98.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.3 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 98.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Yugoslavians | 97.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Asians | 97.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 97.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Aleuts | 97.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | France | 96.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 96.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Laotians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 96.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.37%), Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |