Guatemalan vs Zimbabwean Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Zimbabwean
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Guatemalans
Zimbabweans
7.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Zimbabwean Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 406,520,979 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.415 and weighted average of 7.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,119,087 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075 and weighted average of 4.1%, a difference of 72.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Guatemalan | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 2.1% | 1.0% |
Maximum | 42.2% | 6.9% |
Range | 40.1% | 5.9% |
Mean | 11.9% | 3.4% |
Median | 9.3% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 4.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 1.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 1.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Spanish American Indian (7.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Hopi (7.1%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (7.1%, a difference of 0.81%), Immigrants from Dominica (7.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and Immigrants from Armenia (7.1%, a difference of 0.86%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.8% |
Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.8% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.8% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.0% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.0% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 7.1% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 7.1% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Maltese (4.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ireland (4.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Singapore (4.1%, a difference of 0.37%), Bhutanese (4.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Eastern European (4.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 99.9 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Danes | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 4.1% |