Albanian vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Albanian
Choctaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Albanians
Choctaw
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
78th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Albanian vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,945,474 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Albanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.086 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,534,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 40.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Albanian | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 12.6% |
| Maximum | 36.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 32.2% | 87.4% |
| Mean | 17.8% | 41.2% |
| Median | 17.5% | 38.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.4% | 31.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.1% | 46.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.7% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Albanians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Albanians are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (19.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Australia (19.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Russia (19.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Scotland (19.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (19.4%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |