Potawatomi vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Potawatomi
Choctaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Potawatomi
Choctaw
25.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Potawatomi vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,128,291 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.483 and weighted average of 25.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,534,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 7.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Potawatomi | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 9.1% | 12.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 90.9% | 87.4% |
| Mean | 42.8% | 41.2% |
| Median | 35.3% | 38.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.3% | 31.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.5% | 46.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.2% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.9% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.5% | 16.4% |
Demographics Similar to Potawatomi and Choctaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Aleut (25.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Dominican (25.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Mexico (25.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Central American Indian (25.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Honduras (25.5%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 25.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 25.4% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |