Immigrants from Armenia vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Armenia
Choctaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Armenia
Choctaw
18.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
37th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Armenia vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,216,113 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 18.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,534,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 45.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Armenia | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 12.6% |
| Maximum | 48.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 45.0% | 87.4% |
| Mean | 18.8% | 41.2% |
| Median | 16.9% | 38.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.1% | 31.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.2% | 46.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.0% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Armenia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Armenia are Turkish (18.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (18.6%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |