Bhutanese vs Norwegian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Norwegian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Bhutanese
Norwegians
12.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Norwegian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,391,232 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.176 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 514,648,663 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 4.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 3.9% |
| Maximum | 38.7% | 81.0% |
| Range | 37.0% | 77.1% |
| Mean | 11.7% | 15.5% |
| Median | 9.8% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.3% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 10.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Norwegians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ireland (12.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from Iran (12.6%, a difference of 1.3%), Burmese (13.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and Okinawan (13.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Japan (13.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from China (13.4%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.9% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.1% |
| Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |