Canadian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Canadian
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Canadians
Chickasaw
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Canadian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,032,660 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 28.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Canadian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 33.0% |
| Range | 98.0% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 23.8% | 15.0% |
| Median | 12.5% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.3% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.5% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.0% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.7% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Canadians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Laotian (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 89.8 /100 | #111 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |