Immigrants from Liberia vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Liberia
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Liberia
Chickasaw
13.0%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Liberia vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,246,514 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Liberia and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.604 and weighted average of 13.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 3.8%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Liberia | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 40.3% | 33.0% |
| Range | 37.2% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 13.8% | 15.0% |
| Median | 11.4% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.8% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.4% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Liberia and Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Liberia are Mexican American Indian (13.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.47%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and Cherokee (13.1%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Spanish American (13.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Cree (13.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and Guyanese (13.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |