Immigrants from Netherlands vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Netherlands
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Netherlands
Chickasaw
10.2%
MALE POVERTY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Netherlands vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,754,800 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Netherlands and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 32.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Netherlands | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 32.5% | 33.0% |
| Range | 32.3% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 10.1% | 15.0% |
| Median | 8.7% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Netherlands by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Netherlands are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (10.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Serbian (10.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Zimbabwean (10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Australia (10.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and Paraguayan (10.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Ukrainians | 97.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Austrians | 97.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Swiss | 97.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Serbians | 97.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.3 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Paraguayans | 97.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Europeans | 97.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 96.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Barbadian (13.6%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |