Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Alaskan Athabascan Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,760,693 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.260 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,807,044 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 9.1%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina	Alaskan Athabascan
Minimum	2.0%	0.78%
Maximum	28.1%	69.0%
Range	26.1%	68.2%
Mean	11.4%	21.7%
Median	11.4%	15.9%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.2%	11.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.3%	28.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.1%	16.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.2%	16.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.1%	16.3%

Similar Demographics by Female Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by Female Poverty

In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty
Taiwanese	75.7 /100 \| #149	Good 13.1%
Tsimshian	75.5 /100 \| #150	Good 13.1%
Immigrants \| Germany	74.9 /100 \| #151	Good 13.1%
Samoans	73.6 /100 \| #152	Good 13.1%
Immigrants \| Fiji	71.0 /100 \| #153	Good 13.2%
Armenians	70.4 /100 \| #154	Good 13.2%
Hungarians	70.1 /100 \| #155	Good 13.2%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	69.7 /100 \| #156	Good 13.2%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	68.8 /100 \| #157	Good 13.2%
Pennsylvania Germans	67.3 /100 \| #158	Good 13.2%
Costa Ricans	63.6 /100 \| #159	Good 13.3%
Immigrants \| Nepal	62.7 /100 \| #160	Good 13.3%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	62.5 /100 \| #161	Good 13.3%
Guamanians/Chamorros	62.4 /100 \| #162	Good 13.3%
Immigrants \| Albania	62.4 /100 \| #163	Good 13.3%

Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Female Poverty

In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Bermudan (14.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Marshallese (14.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Panama (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Thailand (14.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants (14.4%, a difference of 0.42%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty
Immigrants \| Uruguay	14.0 /100 \| #206	Poor 14.0%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	9.0 /100 \| #207	Tragic 14.2%
Immigrants \| Azores	7.9 /100 \| #208	Tragic 14.2%
Panamanians	7.7 /100 \| #209	Tragic 14.2%
Malaysians	7.4 /100 \| #210	Tragic 14.3%
Moroccans	7.2 /100 \| #211	Tragic 14.3%
Bermudans	5.5 /100 \| #212	Tragic 14.4%
Alaskan Athabascans	5.3 /100 \| #213	Tragic 14.4%
Marshallese	5.0 /100 \| #214	Tragic 14.4%
Immigrants \| Panama	4.7 /100 \| #215	Tragic 14.4%
Immigrants \| Thailand	4.5 /100 \| #216	Tragic 14.4%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	4.5 /100 \| #217	Tragic 14.4%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	4.4 /100 \| #218	Tragic 14.4%
Japanese	4.1 /100 \| #219	Tragic 14.5%
Alsatians	4.0 /100 \| #220	Tragic 14.5%