Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Turkish Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,760,693 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.260 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,658,978 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.052 and weighted average of 11.9%, a difference of 10.7%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina	Turkish
Minimum	2.0%	0.67%
Maximum	28.1%	22.9%
Range	26.1%	22.2%
Mean	11.4%	10.0%
Median	11.4%	9.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	8.2%	7.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	13.3%	12.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.1%	5.1%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.2%	4.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.1%	4.8%

Similar Demographics by Female Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina by Female Poverty

In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina are Hungarian (13.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Armenian (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (13.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Fiji (13.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and Pennsylvania German (13.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty
Taiwanese	75.7 /100 \| #149	Good 13.1%
Tsimshian	75.5 /100 \| #150	Good 13.1%
Immigrants \| Germany	74.9 /100 \| #151	Good 13.1%
Samoans	73.6 /100 \| #152	Good 13.1%
Immigrants \| Fiji	71.0 /100 \| #153	Good 13.2%
Armenians	70.4 /100 \| #154	Good 13.2%
Hungarians	70.1 /100 \| #155	Good 13.2%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	69.7 /100 \| #156	Good 13.2%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	68.8 /100 \| #157	Good 13.2%
Pennsylvania Germans	67.3 /100 \| #158	Good 13.2%
Costa Ricans	63.6 /100 \| #159	Good 13.3%
Immigrants \| Nepal	62.7 /100 \| #160	Good 13.3%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	62.5 /100 \| #161	Good 13.3%
Guamanians/Chamorros	62.4 /100 \| #162	Good 13.3%
Immigrants \| Albania	62.4 /100 \| #163	Good 13.3%

Demographics Similar to Turks by Female Poverty

In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (11.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Korean (11.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Czech (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Moldova (11.9%, a difference of 0.20%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty
Immigrants \| Poland	99.3 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 11.8%
Macedonians	99.3 /100 \| #40	Exceptional 11.8%
Czechs	99.2 /100 \| #41	Exceptional 11.9%
Immigrants \| Moldova	99.2 /100 \| #42	Exceptional 11.9%
Koreans	99.2 /100 \| #43	Exceptional 11.9%
Tongans	99.2 /100 \| #44	Exceptional 11.9%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	99.2 /100 \| #45	Exceptional 11.9%
Turks	99.2 /100 \| #46	Exceptional 11.9%
Asians	99.1 /100 \| #47	Exceptional 11.9%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.0 /100 \| #48	Exceptional 11.9%
Immigrants \| Romania	99.0 /100 \| #49	Exceptional 12.0%
Slovenes	98.9 /100 \| #50	Exceptional 12.0%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional 12.0%
Immigrants \| Croatia	98.7 /100 \| #52	Exceptional 12.0%
Immigrants \| Austria	98.7 /100 \| #53	Exceptional 12.0%