Jordanian vs Czechoslovakian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jordanian
Czechoslovakian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Jordanians
Czechoslovakians
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
27.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Czechoslovakian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,541,615 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,916,280 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330 and weighted average of 21.3%, a difference of 13.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 7.4% |
| Maximum | 34.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 33.7% | 92.6% |
| Mean | 17.3% | 33.3% |
| Median | 17.8% | 25.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 21.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 39.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 18.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 21.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 21.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
| Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
| Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
| Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
| Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
| Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
| Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |