Jordanian vs Pima Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Jordanian
Pima
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Jordanians
Pima
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jordanian vs Pima Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 165,541,615 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,414,275 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300 and weighted average of 30.3%, a difference of 61.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jordanian | Pima |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 16.1% |
| Maximum | 34.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 33.7% | 83.9% |
| Mean | 17.3% | 42.9% |
| Median | 17.8% | 41.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 24.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 55.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 30.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.8% | 22.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 21.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Jordanians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Cajun (30.6%, a difference of 1.0%), Yuman (29.4%, a difference of 3.0%), Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and Colville (29.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |