Polish vs Laotian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Polish
Laotian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Poles
Laotians
14.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
98.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Laotian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,911,563 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.467 and weighted average of 14.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,849,875 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.571 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 2.0%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Polish | Laotian |
Minimum | 0.49% | 0.17% |
Maximum | 64.3% | 78.1% |
Range | 63.8% | 77.9% |
Mean | 16.3% | 17.1% |
Median | 13.1% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 10.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.8% | 19.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Laotians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Israel (14.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Tsimshian (14.1%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Indonesia (14.1%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Serbia (14.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and Immigrants from Belgium (14.1%, a difference of 0.66%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Bulgaria (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), European (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Slovene (14.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Netherlands (14.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Philippines (14.3%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.1 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Tsimshian | 98.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.6 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 98.6 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 98.5 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Zimbabweans | 98.5 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.4 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Romania | 98.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Slovenes | 98.1 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Europeans | 98.1 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Laotians | 98.0 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.0 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 14.3% |