South African vs Pima Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
South African
Pima
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
South Africans
Pima
20.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
85.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
30.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Pima Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,862,310 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525 and weighted average of 20.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,414,275 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300 and weighted average of 30.3%, a difference of 48.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Pima |
| Minimum | 7.4% | 16.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 92.6% | 83.9% |
| Mean | 23.5% | 42.9% |
| Median | 20.4% | 41.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.2% | 24.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.6% | 55.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 30.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 22.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 21.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to South Africans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Venezuelan (20.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Luxembourger (20.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Austrian (20.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Cajun (30.6%, a difference of 1.0%), Yuman (29.4%, a difference of 3.0%), Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and Colville (29.1%, a difference of 4.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |