Description: Tags: Appendix
Description: Tags: Appendix
Description: Tags: Appendix
By Consortium By SCDE
All grantees Capacity Building Implementation Catalyst All Partners Capacity Building Implementation Catalyst
Question N % N % N % N % N % N % N % N %
2A.1a Did SCDE faculty redesign curricula to integrate
technology?
Response rate 204 91 121 88 61 95 22 96 330 81 137 77 94 90 103 81
Yes 177 87 102 84 57 93 18 82 228 69 107 78 77 82 47 46
Yes, but NOT as a grant activity 16 8 10 8 3 5 3 14 62 19 17 12 13 14 33 32
No 10 5 8 7 1 2 1 5 40 12 13 9 4 4 23 22
Not applicable, not an SCDE 1 <1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2A.1b
How many SCDE faculty members redesigned
curricula to integrate technology?
Response rate 177 100 102 100 57 100 18 100 227 99.5 106 99.1 77 100 47 100
Total 2,169 917 986 322 2,169 917 986 322
Mean 12.8 9.6 17.3 18.9 9.9 9.1 13 7.3
Median 10 7.5 12 15 7 7 8.5 4
Minimum 0 0 1 3 1 1 1 1
Maximum 99 46 99 43 99 38 99 36
Data not available* 8 6 0 1 9 5 1 3
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-1
2A.1e Approximately what proportion of all redesigned
SCDE courses integrated the following
technologies or technology-related tools?
Response rate Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items. 227 99.5 106 99.1 77 100 47 100
Internet or web-based materials
None 4 2 2 2 0 0 2 4
Less than half 23 10 9 8 6 8 8 17
More than half 98 43 45 42 38 49 18 38
All 98 43 49 46 31 40 18 38
Data not available 4 2 1 1 2 3 1 2
Multi-media
None 11 5 5 5 1 1 5 11
Less than half 95 42 48 45 32 42 17 36
More than half 73 32 30 28 28 36 16 34
All 41 18 21 20 13 17 7 15
Data not available 7 3 2 2 3 4 2 4
Software packages for word processing,
spreadsheets, databases
None 9 4 5 5 1 1 3 6
Less than half 46 20 19 18 16 21 12 26
More than half 67 30 39 37 19 25 10 21
All 94 41 38 36 38 49 19 40
Data not available 11 5 5 5 3 4 3 6
Teaching tools
None 54 24 22 21 17 22 16 34
Less than half 94 41 45 42 32 42 19 40
More than half 38 17 21 20 11 14 6 13
All 16 7 8 8 7 9 1 2
Data not available 25 11 10 9 10 13 5 11
E-mail
None 10 4 5 5 2 3 3 6
Less than half 17 7 3 3 7 9 9 19
More than half 58 26 32 30 17 22 9 19
All 136 60 63 59 49 64 25 53
Data not available 6 3 3 3 2 3 1 2
Additional software packages (presentation
software, reference tools)
None 8 4 3 3 2 3 3 6
Less than half 60 26 29 27 22 29 11 23
More than half 87 38 45 42 27 35 15 32
All 61 27 26 25 22 29 14 30
Data not available 11 5 3 3 4 5 4 9
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-2
2A.1e (Continued)
Approximately what proportion of all redesigned
SCDE courses integrated the following
technologies or technology-related tools?
Response rate Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items. 227 99.5 106 99.1 77 100 47 100
Content-specific software
None 32 14 15 14 8 10 9 19
Less than half 90 40 41 39 30 39 21 45
More than half 58 26 28 26 23 30 8 17
All 28 12 13 12 10 13 5 11
Data not available 19 8 9 8 6 8 4 9
Portfolio tools
None 50 22 19 18 18 23 13 28
Less than half 113 50 59 56 38 49 19 40
More than half 27 12 11 10 9 12 7 15
All 25 11 12 11 9 12 4 9
Data not available 12 5 5 5 3 4 4 9
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-3
2A.2c For how many SCD of arts and science courses
were curricula redesigned to integrate
technology?
Response rate 85 100 45 100 29 100 12 100 106 101 47 102 36 100 25 100
Total 763 378 284 102 763 378 284 102
Mean 9.8 9.5 10.1 9.3 8.4 9.2 8.4 6
Median 7 7 7.5 7 6 7 5 4
Minimum 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1
Maximum 50 40 50 40 50 40 50 20
Data not available* 7 5 1 1 15 6 2 8
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-4
2A.2e
(Continued)
Approximately what proportion of all redesigned
SCD of arts and science courses integrated the
following technologies or technology-related
tools?
Response Rate Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items. 106 101 47 102 36 100 25 100
Software packages for word processing,
spreadsheets, databases
None 9 8 4 9 2 6 4 16
Less than half 14 13 8 17 3 8 3 12
More than half 36 34 17 36 14 39 5 20
All 33 31 13 28 14 39 6 24
Data not available 14 13 5 11 3 8 7 28
Teaching tools
None 34 32 19 40 10 28 5 20
Less than half 37 35 16 34 11 31 10 40
More than half 5 5 3 6 2 6 0 0
All 7 7 3 6 3 8 2 8
Data not available 23 22 6 13 10 28 8 32
E-mail
None 7 7 3 6 0 0 4 16
Less than half 7 7 2 4 2 6 3 12
More than half 26 25 11 23 12 33 3 12
All 52 49 27 57 18 50 8 32
Data not available 14 13 4 9 4 11 7 28
Additional software packages (presentation
software, reference tools)
None 6 6 4 9 1 3 1 4
Less than half 20 19 12 26 6 17 2 8
More than half 43 41 17 36 17 47 9 36
All 20 19 9 19 7 19 5 20
Data not available 17 16 5 11 5 14 8 32
Content-specific software
None 13 12 6 13 5 14 2 8
Less than half 33 31 18 38 10 28 5 20
More than half 26 25 9 19 12 33 5 20
All 16 15 8 17 5 14 4 16
Data not available 18 17 6 13 4 11 9 36
Portfolio tools
None 35 33 18 38 11 31 7 28
Less than half 35 33 13 28 15 42 7 28
More than half 7 7 6 13 1 3 0 0
All 5 5 2 4 1 3 2 8
Data not available 24 23 8 17 8 22 9 36
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-5
2A.3a Which of the following were implemented when
redesigning SCDE or SCD of arts and science
curricula?
Response rate 178 100 102 100 58 100 18 100 235 100 108 100 79 100 51 100
Release Time 86 48 43 42 33 57 11 61 97 41 44 41 40 51 16 31
Researching other models 115 65 66 65 34 59 15 83 140 60 69 64 43 54 30 59
Collaboration 172 97 97 95 57 98 18 100 220 94 101 94 77 97 45 88
Partnerships with K-12 schools 158 89 91 89 50 86 18 100 186 79 94 87 59 75 36 71
Other partnerships 98 55 48 47 36 62 15 83 109 46 48 44 41 52 21 41
2A.4a
Were incentives offered to encourage faculty to
integrate technology into their curriculum?
Response rate 201 89 119 86 61 95 22 96 328 80 135 76 94 90 103 81
Yes, as a grant activity 164 82 92 77 56 92 17 77 219 67 102 76 76 81 45 44
Yes, but NOT as a grant activity 10 5 9 8 0 0 1 5 37 11 9 7 6 6 22 21
No 26 13 16 13 5 8 4 18 72 22 24 18 12 13 36 35
Not applicable, not an SCDE 1 <1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-6
2A.4b Which of the following incentives were offered to
encourage faculty to integrate technology into
their curriculum?
Response rate 164 100 92 100 56 100 17 100 219 100 102 100 76 100 45 100
Release time
Yes 75 46 34 37 29 52 13 76 82 37 34 33 34 45 17 38
No 88 54 58 63 26 46 4 24 133 61 68 67 41 54 25 56
Data not available 1 <1 0 0 1 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 1 1 3 7
Stipend
Yes 131 80 72 78 43 77 16 94 166 76 80 78 53 70 35 78
No 33 20 20 22 13 23 1 6 52 24 22 22 22 29 10 22
Data not available 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 <1 0 0 1 1 0 0
Additional technological equipment for
professional use
Yes 122 74 66 72 42 75 14 82 148 68 72 71 57 75 21 47
No 41 25 25 27 14 25 3 18 67 31 29 28 19 25 21 47
Data not available 1 <1 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 2 1 1 0 0 3 7
Additional technological equipment for
instructional use
Yes 138 84 78 85 46 82 14 82 174 79 86 84 64 84 26 58
No 25 15 13 14 10 18 3 18 42 19 15 15 12 16 17 38
Data not available 1 <1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 2 4
Increased professional development
opportunities (e.g., workshops)
Yes 158 96 89 97 54 96 17 100 203 93 96 94 73 96 38 84
No 5 3 2 2 2 4 0 0 13 6 4 4 3 4 6 13
Data not available 1 <1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 2 0 0 1 2
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-7
2A.6a Were SCDE courses delivered to students
through any technological means?
Response rate 200 89 117 85 61 95 22 96 324 79 134 76 94 90 100 79
Yes, as a grant activity 104 52 55 47 37 61 12 55 124 38 58 43 44 47 24 24
Yes, but NOT as a grant activity 63 32 38 69 15 25 10 45 127 39 44 33 31 33 54 54
No 33 17 24 63 9 15 0 0 73 23 32 24 19 20 22 22
Not applicable, not an SCDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2A.7a
Were SCD of arts and science courses involved
in the grant collaboration delivered to students
through any technological means?
Response rate 111 100 61 100 35 100 15 100 139 100 64 100 42 100 35 100
Yes, as a grant activity 47 42 26 43 15 43 6 40 51 37 26 41 16 38 9 26
Yes, but NOT as a grant activity 24 22 15 25 4 11 5 33 36 26 15 23 7 17 15 43
No 38 34 20 33 15 43 3 20 47 34 22 34 17 40 9 26
Data not available 2 2 0 0 1 3 1 7 5 4 1 2 2 5 2 6
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-8
2A.7b How many SCD of arts and science courses
involved in the collaboration were available
through technological means?
Response rate 47 100 26 100 15 100 6 100 40 100 21 100 13 100 6 100
Total 291 126 144 21 291 126 144 21
Mean 7.7 6 12 4.2 7.3 6 11.1 3.5
Median 3.5 3 5 2 3 3 4 2
Minimum 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1
Maximum 66 29 66 12 66 29 66 10
Data not available* 9 5 3 1 11 5 3 3
2A.7c
Which of the following options were available for
SCD of arts and science courses?
Response rate 47 100 26 100 15 100 6 100 51 100 26 100 16 100 9 100
Two-way audio-video conferencing 21 45 10 38 7 47 4 67 19 37 10 38 7 44 2 22
One-way audio-video conferencing 15 32 6 23 5 33 4 67 14 27 6 23 5 31 3 33
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-9
2A.8c Were models or strategies for SCDE faculty to
use in preparing preservice teachers to integrate
technology disseminated in any of the following
ways:
Response rate 201 89 118 86 61 95 22 96 326 80 135 76 93 89 102 80
Locally
Yes, as a grant activity 157 78 90 76 48 79 19 86 200 61 97 72 66 71 38 37
Yes, but NOT as a grant activity 10 5 5 4 3 5 2 9 37 11 7 5 8 9 23 23
No 34 17 23 19 10 16 1 5 89 27 31 23 19 20 41 40
State-wide
Yes, as a grant activity 98 49 45 38 35 57 18 82 118 36 49 36 44 47 26 25
Yes, but NOT as a grant activity 27 13 18 15 7 11 2 9 42 13 19 14 12 13 13 13
No 76 38 55 47 19 31 2 9 166 51 67 50 37 40 63 62
Regionally
Yes, as a grant activity 88 44 41 35 32 52 15 68 100 31 40 30 37 40 23 23
Yes, but NOT as a grant activity 20 10 11 9 5 8 4 18 32 10 12 9 10 11 11 11
No 93 46 66 56 24 39 3 14 194 60 83 61 46 49 68 67
Nationally
Yes, as a grant activity 87 43 43 36 31 51 14 64 97 30 45 33 33 35 21 21
Yes, but NOT as a grant activity 26 13 12 10 9 15 4 18 35 11 12 9 13 14 11 11
No 88 44 63 53 21 34 4 18 194 60 78 58 47 51 70 69
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-10
2A.8d How were models or strategies for SCDE faculty
to use in preparing preservice teachers to
integrate technology disseminated?
Response rate 201 89 118 86 61 95 22 96 326 80 135 76 93 89 102 80
Presentation at a conference
Yes, as a grant activity 136 68 74 63 44 72 19 86 161 49 77 57 56 60 31 30
Yes, but NOT as a grant activity 19 9 13 11 4 7 1 5 39 12 15 11 10 11 15 15
No 46 23 31 26 13 21 2 9 126 39 43 32 27 29 56 55
Article in journal or other publication
Yes, as a grant activity 52 26 26 22 14 23 13 59 59 18 25 19 15 16 20 20
Yes, but NOT as a grant activity 27 13 12 10 10 16 4 18 42 13 14 10 15 16 14 14
No 122 61 80 68 37 61 5 23 225 69 96 71 63 68 68 67
Posting on a Web site
Yes, as a grant activity 128 64 66 56 43 70 20 91 166 51 73 54 55 59 41 40
Yes, but NOT as a grant activity 15 7 11 9 3 5 0 0 31 10 13 10 8 9 10 10
No 58 29 41 35 15 25 2 9 129 40 49 36 30 32 51 50
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-11
2A.9c Approximately what proportion of preservice
students engaged in the following types of
activities during their field experiences?
Response rate Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items. 139 101 68 100 47 102 26 104
Observe K-12 teachers modeling the use
technology in instruction
None 4 3 1 1 1 2 2 8
Less than half 35 25 16 24 12 26 8 31
More than half 60 43 26 38 24 51 11 42
All 21 15 15 22 6 13 0 0
Data not available 19 14 10 15 4 9 5 19
Work individually with K-12 students on
technology-related projects
None 7 5 3 4 1 2 3 12
Less than half 53 38 58 41 16 34 11 42
More than half 48 35 22 32 20 43 6 23
All 11 8 5 7 5 11 1 4
Data not available 20 14 10 15 5 11 5 19
Teach K-12 classes modeling the use of
technology in instruction
None 8 6 5 7 1 2 2 8
Less than half 50 36 23 34 16 34 13 50
More than half 45 32 22 32 18 38 5 19
All 16 12 8 12 6 13 2 8
Data not available 20 14 10 15 6 13 4 15
Observe SCDE faculty teaching K-12 class in
collaboration with K-12 teachers
None 37 27 19 28 8 17 11 42
Less than half 58 42 27 40 25 53 7 27
More than half 15 11 9 13 5 11 1 4
All 6 4 2 3 3 6 1 4
Data not available 23 17 11 16 6 13 6 23
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-12
Approximately what proportion of preservice
2A.9d students used the following technologies or
technology-related tools in their field
experiences?
Response rate Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items. 139 101 68 100 47 102 26 104
Internet or web-based materials
None 3 2 2 3 0 0 1 4
Less than half 31 22 12 18 12 26 8 31
More than half 52 37 22 32 19 40 11 42
All 35 25 21 31 12 26 3 12
Data not available 18 13 11 16 4 9 3 12
Multi-media
None 4 3 1 1 1 2 2 8
Less than half 56 40 23 34 20 43 15 58
More than half 47 34 24 35 17 36 6 23
All 13 9 9 13 4 9 0 0
Data not available 19 14 11 16 5 11 3 12
Software packages for word processing,
spreadsheets, databases
None 4 3 2 3 1 2 1 4
Less than half 27 19 9 13 9 19 9 35
More than half 46 33 27 40 14 30 7 27
All 45 32 21 31 18 38 6 23
Data not available 17 12 9 13 5 11 3 12
Teaching tools
None 19 14 10 15 5 11 4 15
Less than half 56 40 28 41 21 45 8 31
More than half 29 21 11 16 12 26 6 23
All 5 4 2 3 2 4 1 4
Data not available 30 22 17 25 7 15 7 27
E-mail
None 3 2 1 1 1 2 1 4
Less than half 20 14 9 13 7 15 4 15
More than half 42 30 19 28 16 34 8 31
All 57 41 29 43 19 40 10 38
Data not available 17 12 10 15 4 9 3 12
Additional software packages (presentation
software, reference tools)
None 7 5 2 3 3 6 2 8
Less than half 38 27 21 31 11 23 7 27
More than half 49 35 22 32 19 40 9 35
All 22 16 10 15 9 19 3 12
Data not available 23 17 13 19 5 11 5 19
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-13
2A.9d (Continued)
Approximately what proportion of preservice
students used the following technologies or
technology-related tools in their field
experiences?
Response rate Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items. 139 101 68 100 47 102 26 104
Content-specific software
None 8 6 3 4 2 4 3 12
Less than half 50 36 23 34 24 43 9 35
More than half 45 32 21 31 16 34 8 31
All 12 9 7 10 4 9 1 4
Data not available 24 17 14 21 5 11 5 19
Portfolio tools
None 15 11 7 10 4 9 4 15
Less than half 66 47 29 43 24 51 14 54
More than half 26 19 13 19 11 23 3 12
All 7 5 3 4 3 6 1 4
Data not available 25 18 16 24 5 11 4 15
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-14
2B.1c
Of those SCDE faculty who participated in
professional development activities, what
percentage received the following amount of
professional development during the reporting
period?
Response rate Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items. 251 100 117 100 82 100 56 100
1-5 hours
Total 1070.8 398 347.4 332.8
Percent receiving this training 29 24.9 24.5 44.6
6-10 hours
Total 598.9 279.4 215.8 133.5
Percent receiving this training 16 17.4 15.2 17.9
11-20 hours
Total 668.4 314.3 279 89.4
Percent receiving this training 18 19.6 19.7 12
21-50 hours
Total 867.4 399.9 342.1 144.4
Percent receiving this training 24 25 24.2 19.3
More than 50 hours
Total 477.1 210 231.8 46.9
Percent receiving this training 13 13.1 16.4 6.3
Response rate 184 100 107 100 57 100 21 100 251 100 117 100 82 100 56 100
Workshops (required)
Outside trainer 51 28 25 23 15 26 11 52 58 23 26 22 20 24 12 21
SCDE or university technology specialist 68 37 37 35 21 37 12 57 88 35 37 32 34 41 19 34
Professor 56 30 29 27 17 30 10 48 69 27 28 24 26 32 15 27
K-12 teacher 33 18 21 20 8 14 4 19 41 16 22 19 13 16 6 11
Undergraduate or graduate student 20 11 6 6 8 14 6 29 27 11 6 5 14 17 7 13
Workshops (optional)
Outside trainer 96 52 52 49 31 54 15 71 104 41 53 45 33 40 20 36
SCDE or university/college technology
specialist 130 71 70 65 43 75 19 90 148 59 75 64 51 62 25 45
Professor 100 54 55 51 31 54 15 71 111 44 57 49 37 45 18 32
K-12 teacher 69 38 39 36 20 35 11 52 68 27 40 34 21 26 8 14
Undergraduate or graduate student 54 29 24 22 22 39 9 43 56 22 25 21 24 29 8 14
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-15
2B.1d (Continued)
Which of the following types of professional
development were implemented for SCDE faculty,
and which of the following types of professional
development facilitators were used?
Response rate 184 100 107 100 57 100 21 100 251 100 117 100 82 100 56 100
Individual training
Outside trainer 28 15 17 16 4 7 7 33 27 11 17 15 4 5 6 11
SCDE or university technology specialist 120 65 61 57 43 75 18 86 143 57 66 56 56 68 25 45
Professor 88 48 44 41 30 53 16 76 98 39 45 38 38 46 16 29
K-12 teacher 42 23 19 18 18 32 7 33 46 18 21 18 21 26 6 11
Undergraduate or graduate student 78 42 35 33 33 58 11 52 83 33 36 31 35 43 16 29
Available technical support for drop-in
assistance
Outside trainer 15 8 10 9 2 4 3 14 18 7 11 9 2 2 5 9
SCDE or university technology specialist 136 74 75 70 43 75 19 90 161 64 77 66 56 68 30 54
Professor 62 34 33 31 21 37 10 48 71 28 32 27 26 32 15 27
K-12 teacher 19 10 11 10 5 9 3 14 22 9 11 9 7 9 4 7
Undergraduate or graduate student 77 42 37 35 29 51 12 57 80 32 37 32 31 38 13 23
Mentorships
Outside trainer 8 4 4 4 3 5 2 10 8 3 4 3 3 4 2 4
SCDE or university technology specialist 40 22 21 20 11 19 10 48 40 16 21 18 12 15 9 16
Professor 64 35 33 31 20 35 13 62 73 29 33 28 25 30 18 32
K-12 teacher 36 20 21 20 13 23 3 14 41 16 26 22 14 17 2 4
Undergraduate or graduate student 36 20 14 13 17 30 7 33 36 14 14 12 17 21 8 14
Conferences
Outside trainer 70 38 36 34 25 44 11 52 81 32 39 33 28 34 15 27
SCDE or university technology specialist 62 34 29 27 22 39 12 57 71 28 30 26 29 35 13 23
Professor 82 45 42 39 29 51 12 57 97 39 44 38 37 45 17 30
K-12 teacher 43 23 20 19 17 30 7 33 50 20 22 19 24 29 5 9
Undergraduate or graduate student 25 14 11 10 13 23 2 10 31 12 11 9 19 23 2 4
Courses
Outside trainer 22 12 10 9 9 16 3 14 22 9 10 9 9 11 3 5
SCDE or university technology specialist 36 20 12 11 16 28 8 38 38 15 12 10 18 22 8 14
Professor 42 23 22 21 11 19 9 43 41 16 20 17 13 16 8 14
K-12 teacher 7 4 4 4 3 5 0 0 7 3 4 3 3 4 0 0
Undergraduate or graduate student 9 5 4 4 5 9 0 0 9 4 4 3 5 6 0 0
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-16
2B.1f Were SCDE faculty assessed on their level of
technology proficiency?
Response rate 184 100 107 100 57 100 21 100 251 100 117 100 82 100 56 100
Yes 145 79 85 79 45 79 16 76 171 68 86 74 56 68 32 57
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-17
2B.1h How many SCDE faculty who participated in
professional development to integrate technology
were rated as technologically proficient using the
assessment tool identified in the previous
question
Self-assessment
Response rate 99 65 24 11 111 67 31 14
Total 893 546 256 111 893 546 256 111
Mean 9 8.4 10.7 10.1 8 8.1 8.3 7.9
Median 8 7 9.5 9 6 6 6 4.5
Minimum 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 1
Maximum 47 47 27 34 47 47 27 30
Data not available
Observation (e.g., by dean, technology
coordinator, facilitator)
Response rate 49 31 13 6 52 31 15 7
Total 469 224 169 107 469 224 169 107
Mean 9.6 7.2 13 17.8 9 7.2 11.3 15.3
Median 7 6 12 7.5 6 6 8 10
Minimum 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 3
Maximum 55 20 31 55 44 20 31 44
Data not available
Exam (e.g., multiple choice test, short answer
test)
Response rate 8 5 3 0 8 5 3 0
Total 70 50 20 0 70 50 20 0
Mean 8.8 10 6.7 0 8.8 10 6.7 0
Median 8.5 12 4 0 8.5 12 4 0
Minimum 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0
Maximum 20 20 15 0 20 20 15 0
Data not available
Portfolio assessment
Response rate 7 4 1 2 8 4 1 3
Total 102 34 9 59 102 34 9 59
Mean 14.6 8.5 9 29.5 12.8 8.5 9 19.7
Median 9 8.5 9 29.5 9 8.5 9 9
Minimum 5 5 9 9 5 5 9 6
Maximum 50 12 9 50 44 12 9 44
Data not available
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-18
2B.2a Was professional development provided to SCD
of arts and science faculty to integrate technology
in course instruction?
Response rate 110 100 61 100 34 100 15 100 140 100 64 100 41 100 37 100
Yes, as a grant activity 87 79 51 84 27 79 10 67 105 75 54 84 34 83 18 49
Yes, but NOT as a grant activity 6 5 3 5 1 3 2 13 13 9 3 5 2 5 8 22
No 17 15 7 11 6 18 3 20 22 16 7 11 5 12 11 30
2B.2b
How many SCD of arts and science faculty
members received professional development to
integrate technology in course instruction?
Response rate 88 101 52 102 27 100 10 100 106 101 55 102 34 100 18 100
Total 1,564 650 645 272 1,564 650 645 272
Mean 17.8 12.5 23.9 27.2 14.8 11.8 19 15.1
Median 8 7.5 10 7 7 8 7.5 4.5
Minimum 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 1
Maximum 242 106 242 137 165 101 165 110
Response rate Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items. 106 101 55 102 34 100 18 100
1-5 hours
Total 686.3 216.8 342.1 127.4
Percent receiving this training 44 33 53 47
6-10 hours
Total 277.5 145.6 87.8 44
Percent receiving this training 18 22 14 16
11-20 hours
Total 194.2 120 66.1 8
Percent receiving this training 12 18 10 29
21-50 hours
Total 222.9 97.6 93.3 32.9
Percent receiving this training 14 15 14 12
More than 50 hours
Total 183.2 70 55.6 59.6
Percent receiving this training 12 11 9 22
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-19
2B.2d
Which of the following types of professional
development were implemented for SCD of arts
and science faculty and which of the following
types of professional development facilitators
were used?
Response rate 88 101 52 102 27 100 10 100 106 101 55 102 34 100 18 100
Workshops (required)
Outside trainer 28 32 14 27 8 30 7 70 28 26 14 25 8 24 7 39
SCDE or university technology specialist 38 43 16 31 14 52 9 90 40 38 16 29 17 50 8 44
Professor 26 30 12 23 5 19 9 90 24 23 12 22 5 15 7 39
K-12 teacher 18 20 11 21 4 15 3 30 21 20 11 20 5 15 5 28
Undergraduate or graduate student 11 13 6 12 3 11 2 20 12 11 6 11 3 9 3 17
Workshops (optional)
Outside trainer 43 49 26 50 13 48 5 50 42 40 26 47 14 41 3 17
SCDE or university technology specialist 61 69 35 67 19 70 8 80 68 64 37 67 23 68 9 50
Professor 41 47 23 44 13 48 5 50 45 42 24 44 15 44 6 33
K-12 teacher 22 25 16 31 4 15 2 20 22 21 16 29 4 12 2 11
Undergraduate or graduate student 21 24 13 25 6 22 2 20 35 33 14 25 7 21 2 11
Individual training
Outside trainer 13 15 7 13 5 19 2 20 13 12 7 13 5 15 2 11
SCDE or university technology specialist 55 63 30 58 20 74 6 60 61 58 33 60 24 71 5 28
Professor 37 42 22 42 11 41 4 40 42 40 24 44 13 38 5 28
K-12 teacher 18 20 10 19 6 22 2 20 19 18 54 98 32 94 18 100
Undergraduate or graduate student 32 36 18 35 9 33 5 50 23 22 19 35 10 29 6 33
Available technical support for drop-in
assistance
Outside trainer 5 6 3 6 1 4 1 10 4 4 3 5 1 3 0 0
SCDE or university technology specialist 56 64 35 67 15 56 7 70 60 57 36 65 20 59 5 28
Professor 20 23 11 21 5 19 4 40 22 21 11 20 7 21 4 22
K-12 teacher 7 8 4 8 1 4 2 20 7 7 4 7 1 3 2 11
Undergraduate or graduate student 27 31 16 31 8 30 3 30 29 27 16 29 9 26 4 22
Mentorships
Outside trainer 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0
SCDE or university technology specialist 15 17 7 13 6 22 2 20 15 14 7 13 7 21 1 6
Professor 20 23 8 15 6 22 6 60 21 20 9 16 8 24 4 22
K-12 teacher 9 10 4 8 4 15 1 10 11 10 5 9 5 15 1 6
Undergraduate or graduate student 15 17 7 13 7 26 1 10 15 14 7 13 7 21 1 6
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-20
2B.2d
(Continued)
Which of the following types of professional
development were implemented for SCD of arts
and science faculty and which of the following
types of professional development facilitators
were used?
Response rate 88 101 52 102 27 100 10 100 106 101 55 102 34 100 18 100
Conferences
Outside trainer 29 33 14 27 13 48 3 30 31 29 15 27 14 41 3 17
SCDE or university/college technology
specialist 23 26 12 23 7 26 5 50 24 23 13 24 8 24 4 22
Professor 26 30 12 23 9 33 5 50 28 26 14 25 11 32 3 17
K-12 teacher 17 19 10 19 6 22 1 10 19 18 11 20 7 21 1 6
Undergraduate or graduate student 7 8 4 8 3 11 0 0 8 8 4 7 4 12 0 0
Courses
Outside trainer 7 8 4 8 2 7 1 10 7 7 4 7 2 6 1 6
SCDE or university/college technology
specialist 12 14 5 10 4 15 3 30 12 11 6 11 4 12 2 11
Professor 8 9 4 8 2 7 2 20 6 6 4 7 2 6 0 0
K-12 teacher 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Undergraduate or graduate student 3 3 3 6 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 5 0 0 0 0
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-21
2B.2g
How many SCD of arts and science faculty who
participated in professional development to
integrate technology were rated as technologically
proficient using the assessment tool identified in
the question above.
Self-assessment
Response rate 40 27 8 5 44 29 10 5
Total 411 324 64 44 411 324 64 44
Mean 10.3 12 8 8.8 9.3 11.2 6.4 8.8
Median 6 6 7 9 4.5 6 4.5 9
Minimum 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2
Maximum 106 106 21 21 106 106 21 21
Data not available
Observation (e.g., by dean, technology
coordinator, facilitator)
Response rate 19 11 5 3 20 11 5 4
Total 204 60 57 87 204 60 57 87
Mean 10.7 5.5 11.4 29 10.2 5.5 11.4 21.8
Median 7 6 11 9 7.5 6 11 11
Minimum 0 0 3 4 0 0 3 4
Maximum 74 13 21 74 61 13 21 61
Data not available
Exam (e.g., multiple choice test, short answer
test)
Response rate 3 3 0 0 3 3 0 0
Total 9 9 0 0 9 9 0 0
Mean 3 3 0 0 3 3 0 0
Median 3 3 0 0 3 3 0 0
Minimum 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maximum 6 6 6 6 0 0
Data not available
Portfolio assessment
Response rate 5 3 1 1 6 3 1 2
Total 47 8 19 20 47 8 19 20
Mean 9.4 2.7 19 20 7.8 2.7 19 10
Median 6 2 19 20 6.5 2 19 10
Minimum 0 0 19 20 0 0 19 7
Maximum 20 6 19 20 19 6 19 13
Data not available
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-22
2B.3a Was professional development provided to K-12
teachers at partner schools to integrate
technology in class instruction?
Response rate 197 100 115 100 60 100 22 100 304 100 130 100 90 100 88 100
Yes, as a grant activity 124 63 71 62 44 73 10 45 153 50 79 61 52 58 24 27
Yes, but NOT as a grant activity 20 10 14 12 3 5 3 14 31 10 15 12 9 10 7 8
No 53 27 30 26 13 22 9 41 120 39 36 28 29 32 57 65
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-23
2B.3d Which of the following types of professional
development were implemented for K-12
teachers, and which of the following types of
professional development facilitators were used?
Response rate 127 102 73 103 44 100 11 110 156 102 81 103 52 100 25 104
Workshops (required)
Outside trainer 29 23 16 22 6 14 7 64 36 23 17 21 7 13 12 48
SCDE or university/college technology
specialist 34 27 15 21 12 27 7 64 37 24 15 19 14 27 8 32
Professor 39 31 17 23 14 32 8 73 37 24 17 21 13 25 7 28
K-12 teacher 26 20 15 21 8 18 3 27 27 17 14 17 8 15 5 20
Undergraduate or graduate student 16 13 5 7 5 11 6 55 15 10 5 6 5 10 5 20
Workshops (optional)
Outside trainer 47 37 24 33 18 41 6 55 50 32 26 32 19 37 6 24
SCDE or university/college technology
specialist 56 44 30 41 23 52 3 27 53 34 30 37 22 42 1 4
Professor 55 43 27 37 22 50 6 55 52 33 27 33 21 40 5 20
K-12 teacher 43 34 27 37 12 27 4 36 44 28 27 33 13 25 4 16
Undergraduate or graduate student 31 24 13 18 13 30 6 55 29 19 13 16 13 25 4 16
Individual training
Outside trainer 14 11 8 11 4 9 3 27 16 10 8 10 5 10 4 16
SCDE or university/college technology
specialist 38 30 24 33 13 30 2 18 40 26 25 31 14 27 2 8
Professor 34 27 21 29 7 16 6 55 33 21 21 26 7 13 6 24
K-12 teacher 29 23 19 26 7 16 4 36 26 17 17 21 6 12 4 16
Undergraduate or graduate student 35 28 20 27 12 27 5 45 35 22 20 25 12 23 5 20
Available technical support for drop-in
assistance
Outside trainer 12 9 6 8 4 9 3 27 14 9 6 7 4 8 5 20
SCDE or university/college technology
specialist 46 36 26 36 16 36 4 36 46 29 26 32 16 31 4 16
Professor 26 20 15 21 8 18 4 36 25 16 15 19 7 13 4 16
K-12 teacher 23 18 17 23 4 9 3 27 21 13 16 20 4 8 2 8
Undergraduate or graduate student 28 22 14 19 11 25 4 36 27 17 14 17 11 21 3 12
Mentorships
Outside trainer 5 4 3 4 1 2 1 9 6 4 4 5 1 2 1 4
SCDE or university/college technology
specialist 16 13 8 11 7 16 1 9 15 10 8 10 7 13 0 0
Professor 32 25 16 22 11 25 5 45 33 21 17 21 11 21 5 20
K-12 teacher 27 21 16 22 9 20 3 27 26 17 16 20 9 17 2 8
Undergraduate or graduate student 22 17 10 14 10 23 4 36 21 13 9 11 10 19 4 16
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-24
2B.3d (Continued)
Which of the following types of professional
development were implemented for K-12
teachers, and which of the following types of
professional development facilitators were used?
Response rate 127 102 73 103 44 100 11 110 156 102 81 103 52 100 25 104
Conferences 0 0 0
Outside trainer 26 20 16 22 8 18 2 18 28 18 17 21 9 17 2 8
SCDE or university/college technology
specialist 21 17 13 18 6 14 2 18 22 14 13 16 7 13 2 8
Professor 26 20 14 19 9 20 3 27 30 19 15 19 11 21 5 20
K-12 teacher 28 22 16 22 9 20 4 36 29 19 16 20 9 17 5 20
Undergraduate or graduate student 12 9 5 7 6 14 1 9 13 8 5 6 6 12 2 8
Courses
Outside trainer 5 4 5 7 0 0 0 0 5 3 5 6 0 0 0 0
SCDE or university/college technology
specialist 18 14 6 8 11 25 1 9 16 10 6 7 9 17 1 4
Professor 19 15 7 10 11 25 2 18 16 10 7 9 9 17 1 4
K-12 teacher 4 3 3 4 1 2 0 0 3 2 2 2 1 2 0 0
Undergraduate or graduate student 3 2 1 1 2 5 0 0 3 2 1 1 2 4 0 0
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-25
2B.4a
LEAD ORGANIZATIONS ONLY: In addition to
SCDE and SCD of arts and science faculty at
partner institutions and K-12 teachers, how many
other individuals participated in professional
development?
Preservice students
Response rate 172 76 105 76 52 81 15 65 These items were asked only of lead organizations
Total 13,245 7,260 4,029 1,956
Mean 77 69.1 77.5 130.4
Median 10 10 12 3
Minimum 0 0 0 0
Maximum 2,400 2,400 1,792 1,500
Community college faculty
Response rate 147 65 87 63 45 70 15 65 These items were asked only of lead organizations
Total 260 65 33 162
Mean 1.8 1 1 10.8
Median 0 0 0 0
Minimum 0 0 0 0
Maximum 129 15 12 129
SCDE and SCD of arts and science faculty at
non-consortium member schools
Response rate 143 64 84 61 45 70 14 61 These items were asked only of lead organizations
Total 1,026 48 131 847
Mean 7.2 1 2.9 60.5
Median 0 0 0 3.5
Minimum 0 0 0 0
Maximum 578 17 64 578
Faculty in school or colleges outside the SCDE
and SCD of arts and science
Response rate 138 61 82 59 44 69 12 52 These items were asked only of lead organizations
Total 695 129 66 500
Mean 5 1.6 1.5 41.7
Median 0 0 0 0
Minimum 0 0 0 0
Maximum 450 39 30 450
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-26
Response rate 109 100 68 100 34 100 7 100 207 101 85 100 56 104 70 100
Yes 63 58 41 60 18 53 5 71 103 50 45 53 28 50 32 46
No 34 32 19 28 14 41 0 0 62 30 24 28 23 41 17 24
Data not available 12 11 8 12 2 6 2 17 42 20 16 19 5 9 21 30
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-27
2C.1c
(Continued)
Which of the following abilities were new
requirements for preservice students to
demonstrate for purposes of graduation:
Response rate 44 102 21 100 16 107 7 100 44 102 21 100 16 107 7 100
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-28
2C.1d Which of the following means did you use to
assess preservice students' performance in the
graduation requirements listed in the previous
question (2C.1c)?
Response rate 44 102 21 100 16 107 7 100 44 102 21 100 16 107 7 100
In-class demonstration
Yes 41 93 19 90 15 94 7 100 40 91 19 90 15 94 6 86
No 1 2 1 5 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 5 0 0 0 0
Data not available 2 5 1 5 1 6 0 0 3 7 1 5 1 6 1 14
Exam (e.g., multiple choice test, short answer
test)
Yes 15 34 7 33 5 31 3 43 12 27 7 33 5 31 0 0
No 26 59 12 57 10 63 4 57 27 61 12 57 9 56 6 86
Data not available 3 7 2 10 1 6 0 0 5 11 2 10 2 13 1 14
Self-assessment
Yes 35 80 14 67 14 88 7 100 32 73 14 67 13 81 5 71
No 8 18 6 29 2 13 0 0 9 20 6 29 2 13 1 14
Data not available 1 2 1 5 0 0 0 0 3 7 1 5 1 6 1 14
Portfolio assessment
Yes 37 84 17 81 15 94 5 71 34 77 17 81 14 88 3 43
No 6 14 3 14 1 6 2 29 7 16 3 14 1 6 3 43
Data not available 1 2 1 5 0 0 0 0 3 7 1 5 1 6 1 14
Performance assessment
Yes 37 84 17 81 14 88 6 86 35 80 17 81 13 81 5 71
No 5 11 3 14 2 13 0 0 6 14 3 14 3 19 0 0
Data not available 2 5 1 5 0 0 1 14 3 7 1 5 0 0 2 29
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-29
2C.1f Does your state require preservice students to
demonstrate proficiency in the use of technology
in teaching and learning as a condition for
graduation?
Response rate 201 89 118 86 61 95 22 96 325 79 135 76 93 89 101 80
Yes 97 48 52 44 28 46 17 77 128 39 58 43 36 39 36 36
No 95 47 59 50 31 51 5 23 156 48 67 50 52 56 39 39
Data not available 9 4 7 6 2 3 0 0 41 13 10 7 5 5 26 26
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-30
2D.1b About what proportion of all SCDE faculty and
students used the following types of technology to
communicate?
Response rate 175 99 77 99 59 100 42 100
Email
None 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Less than half 12 7 5 6 2 3 6 14
More than half 73 42 32 42 29 49 13 30
All 88 50 39 51 27 46 24 56
Data not available 2 1 1 1 1 2 0 0
ListServs
None 16 9 4 5 4 7 9 21
Less than half 86 49 45 58 27 46 16 37
More than half 39 22 17 22 18 31 4 9
All 15 9 4 5 6 10 5 12
Data not available 19 11 7 9 4 7 9 21
World Wide Web/Internet
None 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 2
Less than half 31 18 13 17 11 19 8 19
More than half 69 39 33 43 24 41 13 30
All 68 39 30 39 20 34 19 44
Data not available 6 3 1 1 4 7 2 5
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-31
2D.2b About what proportion of all SCDE faculty applied
technology in their courses in the following ways?
Response rate Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items. 237 99.5 108 99 77 100 56 100
Used the Web as an online resource for syllabi,
lesson plans, and course materials
None 9 4 3 3 2 3 4 7
Less than half 111 47 50 46 38 49 27 48
More than half 77 32 35 32 29 38 13 23
All 29 12 16 15 5 7 8 14
Data not available 11 5 4 4 3 4 4 7
Required students to use the Web to conduct
research, including accessing documents and
online bibliographic services
None 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 4
Less than half 69 29 29 27 24 31 19 34
More than half 113 48 54 50 38 49 22 39
All 40 17 19 18 12 16 9 16
Data not available 13 5 6 6 3 4 4 7
Used presentation software and multi-media
(including digital cameras and scanners) to create
electronic presentations
None 9 4 3 3 2 3 4 7
Less than half 134 57 61 56 41 53 36 64
More than half 67 28 33 31 27 35 7 13
All 14 6 6 6 4 5 4 7
Data not available 13 5 5 5 3 4 5 9
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-32
2D.2b (Continued)
About what proportion of all SCDE faculty applied
technology in their courses in the following ways?
Response rate Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items. 237 99.5 108 99 77 100 56 100
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-33
2D.3d Who provided technical support to SCDE faculty,
staff, and students during the reporting period?
Response rate 199 88 116 84 61 95 22 96 324 79 134 76 93 89 101 80
Outside consultant
Yes 84 42 44 38 27 44 15 68 98 30 49 37 29 31 23 23
No 107 54 69 59 31 51 5 23 187 58 81 60 57 61 50 50
Data not available 8 4 3 3 3 5 2 9 39 12 4 3 7 8 28 28
SCDE technology support specialist
Yes 162 81 88 76 55 90 19 86 227 70 97 72 77 83 57 56
No 35 18 27 23 6 10 2 9 76 23 35 26 14 15 27 27
Data not available 2 <1 1 1 0 0 1 5 21 6 2 1 2 2 17 17
University technology support specialist
Yes 177 89 104 90 51 84 22 100 273 84 118 88 77 83 82 80
No 21 11 11 9 10 16 0 0 37 11 14 10 15 16 8 8
Data not available 1 <1 1 1 0 0 0 0 15 5 2 1 1 1 12 12
Professor
Yes 149 75 88 76 44 72 17 77 215 66 97 72 67 72 54 53
No 44 22 27 23 14 23 3 14 81 25 35 26 20 22 27 27
Data not available 6 3 1 1 3 5 2 9 28 9 2 1 6 6 20 20
K-12 teacher
Yes 67 34 42 36 17 28 8 36 77 24 47 35 20 22 11 11
No 118 59 69 59 37 61 12 55 205 63 81 60 63 68 64 63
Data not available 14 7 5 4 7 11 2 9 42 13 6 5 10 11 26 26
Undergraduate or graduate student
Yes 138 69 75 65 46 75 17 77 183 56 79 59 61 66 46 45
No 53 27 38 33 13 21 2 9 105 32 50 37 26 28 30 29
Data not available 8 4 3 3 2 3 3 14 37 11 5 4 6 6 26 25
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-34
3A.1b How many preservice students demonstrated
proficiency in the following ways:
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-35
3A.1d How many of the preservice students that
demonstrated proficiency in using technology
were in their graduating year?
Response rate 82 100 45 100 28 100 10 100 102 101 36 100 27 100 19 106
Total 4,859 1,389 1,986 1,484 4,859 1,389 1,986 1,484
Mean 85.2 46.3 99.3 212 71.5 42.1 86.3 123.7
Median 40 20 48 62 29.5 16 50 18.5
Minimum 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Maximum 1,025 243 580 1,028 1,006 243 386 1,006
Data not available* 25 15 8 3 34 15 13 7
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-36
3A.3b
What type of assessment tool did you develop to
measure preservice students' ability to integrate
technology into instruction?
Response rate 84 100 46 100 27 100 11 100 99 101 46 100 34 100 20 105
In-class demonstration/observation 50 60 28 61 15 56 7 64 55 56 29 63 17 50 9 45
Exam (e.g., multiple choice test, short answer
test) 19 23 13 28 4 15 2 18 19 19 13 28 4 12 2 10
Self-assessment 71 85 37 80 24 89 10 91 80 81 35 76 30 88 16 80
Portfolio assessment 42 50 21 46 14 52 7 64 42 42 19 41 15 44 8 40
Performance assessment 48 57 23 50 17 63 8 73 53 54 24 52 19 56 10 50
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-37
4C.2a In which of the following activities were the K-12
schools involved?
Response rate 183 100 109 100 58 100 18 100 233 100 118 100 74 100 45 100
Providing clinical opportunities for preservice
students
Yes 166 91 98 90 52 90 17 94 206 88 107 91 67 91 35 78
No 15 8 9 8 6 10 1 6 19 8 9 8 7 9 4 9
Data not available 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 8 3 2 2 0 0 6 13
Modeling effective use of technology in
instruction by K-12 teachers for SCDE faculty
Yes 107 58 68 62 30 52 9 50 125 54 73 62 40 54 12 27
No 68 37 38 35 25 43 7 39 90 39 42 36 29 39 23 51
Data not available 8 4 3 3 3 5 2 11 18 8 3 3 5 7 10 22
Modeling effective use of technology in
instruction by K-12 teachers for preservice
students
Yes 144 79 85 78 46 79 13 72 178 76 94 80 59 80 27 60
No 24 13 16 15 7 12 2 11 31 13 16 14 8 11 8 18
Data not available 15 8 8 7 5 9 3 17 24 10 8 7 7 9 10 22
Providing mentors for preservice students
Yes 117 64 66 61 37 64 15 83 144 62 70 59 48 65 28 62
No 59 32 40 37 19 33 1 6 75 32 44 37 23 31 10 22
Data not available 7 4 3 3 2 3 2 11 14 6 4 3 3 4 7 16
Designing and developing of high-quality
induction programs for program graduates
Yes 42 23 20 18 17 29 6 33 46 20 21 18 19 26 8 18
No 124 68 76 70 40 69 9 50 156 67 84 71 52 70 22 49
Data not available 17 9 13 12 1 2 3 17 31 13 13 11 3 4 15 33
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-38
4C.2a In which of the following activities were the K-12
schools involved? (cont.)
Response rate 183 100 109 100 58 100 18 100 233 100 118 100 74 100 45 100
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-39
6A.2a
Were any technology training program activities
targeted to students with disabilities?
Response rate Data not aggregated at the consortium level for these items. 236 58 99 56 66 63 75 59
Yes, as a grant activity 35 15 14 14 14 21 7 9
Yes, but NOT as a grant activity 32 14 14 14 8 12 10 13
No 134 57 58 59 42 64 38 51
Data not available 35 15 13 13 2 3 20 27
Response rates may exceed 100 if respondent noted they did not undertake a specific activity but provided data.
* Responses not included in summary statistics B-40
ARCHIVED INFORMATION
How does your state's standards for initial certification address Is your state in the process of
Do your state's standards for technology? reviewing initial certification or
initial certification of teachers licensure requirements to add or
By the required completion of expand technology
address technology? By the assessment of technology technology or technology- requirements?
proficiency? integrated courses?
State No Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes
Alabama 3 1 0 2 2 0 1 3
Alaska 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
Arizona 1 2 1 1 2 0 1 2
Arkansas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
California 1 17 9 8 14 3 6 12
Colorado 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1
Connecticut 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Delaware 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
District of Columbia 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1
Florida 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 2
Georgia 1 6 4 2 5 1 0 7
Hawaii 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0
Idaho 0 2 2 0 1 1 2 0
Illinois 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0
Indiana 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1
Iowa 2 3 0 3 3 0 3 2
Kansas 3 2 0 2 2 0 0 5
Kentucky 0 3 3 0 0 3 2 1
Louisiana 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 4
Maine 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Maryland 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 5
Massachusetts 2 3 0 2 1 1 2 1
Michigan 2 1 0 1 1 0 1 2
Minnesota 3 6 3 3 4 2 5 4
Mississippi 3 2 0 2 2 0 2 3
Missouri 2 4 3 1 0 4 0 6
Montana 1 3 1 2 1 2 2 2
Nebraska 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Nevada 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
New Hampshire 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
New Jersey 2 4 0 4 2 2 3 3
New Mexico 0 3 1 2 3 0 0 3
New York 3 4 2 2 2 2 1 6
North Carolina 0 6 5 1 1 5 3 3
North Dakota 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1
Ohio 1 6 0 6 3 3 3 3
Oklahoma 0 2 0 2 2 0 1 1
Oregon 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
Pennsylvania 3 4 0 4 2 2 2 5
Rhode Island 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
South Carolina 4 2 0 2 2 0 3 3
South Dakota 2 0 0 1 1 0 1 1
Tennessee 0 3 0 3 3 0 2 1
Texas 5 8 3 4 5 2 1 12
Utah 0 2 0 2 2 0 1 1
Virginia 1 5 4 1 1 4 4 2
Vermont 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Washington 1 2 0 2 2 0 3 0
Wisconsin 1 2 2 0 1 1 1 2
West Virginia 0 2 0 2 2 0 1 1
Wyoming 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1
Outlying areas 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total 69 124 48 76 80 44 71 118
B-41