FTFS Chap23 P054
FTFS Chap23 P054
FTFS Chap23 P054
23-54 Glycerin is heated by ethylene glycol in a thin-walled double-pipe parallel-flow heat exchanger. The
rate of heat transfer, the outlet temperature of the glycerin, and the mass flow rate of the ethylene glycol
are to be determined.
Assumptions 1 Steady operating conditions exist. 2 The heat exchanger is well-insulated so that heat loss
to the surroundings is negligible and thus heat transfer from the hot fluid is equal to the heat transfer to
the cold fluid. 3 Changes in the kinetic and potential energies of fluid streams are negligible. 4 There is no
fouling. 5 Fluid properties are constant. 6 The thermal resistance of the inner tube is negligible since the
tube is thin-walled and highly conductive.
Properties The specific heats of glycerin and ethylene
glycol are given to be 2.4 and 2.5 kJ/kg.C,
respectively.
Analysis (a) The temperature differences at the
two ends are
Hot ethylene
T1 Th ,in Tc,in 60 C 20 C = 40 C
60C
3 kg/s
T1 T2
40 15
Tlm
255
. C
ln( T1 / T2 ) ln(40 / 15)
Glycerin
20C
0.3 kg/s
Tout Tin
Q
19.584 kW
20C
47.2C
Cp
m
(0.3 kg/s)(2.4 kJ/kg.C)
Q
19.584 kJ/s
3.56 kg/s
C p (Tin Tout )
(2.5 kJ/kg.C)[(47.2 + 15)C 60C]
23-37
Air
(1.1 kg/s)(1.1 kJ/kg.C)(180C 95C)
95 kPa
= 103 kW
20C
0.8 m3/s
PV
(95 kPa)(0.8 m 3 / s)
0.904 kg / s
RT (0.287 kPa. m 3 / kg.K) 293 K
Exhaust gases
1.1 kg/s
95C
Q
103 10 3 W
20C
133C
Cp
m
(0.904 kg/s)(1005 J/kg.C)
23-38
Tout Tin
Q
940.5 kW
170C
129C
mC p
(10 kg/s)(2.3 kJ/kg.C)
The logarithmic mean temperature difference for counterflow arrangement and the correction factor F are
Oil
170C
10 kg/s
Tlm,CF
T1 T2
100 109
105C 70C
ln(T1 / T2 ) ln(100 / 109)
Water
20C
4.5 kg/s
t 2 t1 129 170
0.27
T1 t1 20 170
F 1.0
T T 20 70
R 1 2
1.2
t 2 t1 129 170
Then the heat transfer surface area on the tube side becomes
UA FT
Q
s
lm ,CF
As
Q
940.5 kW
15 m 2
2
UFTlm ,CF
(0.6 kW/m .C)(1.0)(105C)
23-39
Tout Tin
Q
418 kW
170C
151.8C
mC p
(10 kg/s)(2.3 kJ/kg.C)
The logarithmic mean temperature difference for counterflow arrangement and the correction factor F are
Oil
170C
10 kg/s
T1 T2
100 1318
.
115.2 C
ln( T1 / T2 ) ln(100 / 1318
. )
70C
Water
20C
2 kg/s
t t 151.8 170
P 2 1
0.12
T1 t1 20 170
F 1.0
T T
20 70
R 1 2
2.7
t 2 t1 151.8 170
Then the heat transfer surface area on the tube side becomes
U A FT
Q
i i
lm ,CF
Ai
Q
418 kW
6.05 m 2
U i FTlm ,CF
(0.6 kW/m 2 .C)(1.0)(115 .2C)
23-40
The logarithmic mean temperature difference for counterflow arrangement and the correction factor F are
Water
90C
T1 Th ,in Tc,out 95 C 70 C = 25 C
T2 Th ,out Tc,in 45 C 25 C = 20 C
Tlm,CF
T1 T2
25 20
22.4 C
ln( T1 / T2 ) ln(25 / 20)
t 2 t1 45 95
0.7
T1 t1 25 95
F 0.77
70C
Ethyl
Alcohol
25C
2.1 kg/s
(8 tube passes)
45C
T T 25 70
R 1 2
0.9
t 2 t1 45 95
Then the heat transfer surface area on the tube side becomes
U A FT
Q
i i
lm ,CF
Ai
Q
252.3 kW
15.4 m 2
U i FTlm,CF
(0.950 kW/m 2 .C)(0.77)(22.4C)
23-41
The logarithmic mean temperature difference for counterflow arrangement and the correction factor F are
Ethylene
110C
Tlm,CF
70C
T1 T2
40 38
39 C
ln( T1 / T2 ) ln(40 / 38)
Water
22C
0.8 kg/s
t 2 t1 60 110
0.57
T1 t1 22 110
F 0.94
T T 22 70
R 1 2
0.96
t 2 t1 60 110
Then the heat transfer surface area on the tube side becomes
U A FT
Q
i i
lm ,CF
Ai
Q
160.5 kW
15.6 m 2
U i FTlm ,CF
(0.28 kW/m 2 .C)(0.94)(39C)
23-42
Q [kW]
80.26
100.3
120.4
140.4
160.5
180.6
200.6
220.7
240.8
260.8
280.9
301
321
341.1
361.2
381.2
401.3
421.3
441.4
A [m2]
7.82
9.775
11.73
13.69
15.64
17.6
19.55
21.51
23.46
25.42
27.37
29.33
31.28
33.24
35.19
37.15
39.1
41.06
43.01
23-43
450
45
400
40
area
30
250
25
200
20
150
15
100
10
50
0.25
0.65
1.05
1.45
mw [kg/s]
23-44
1.85
5
2.25
300
Q [kW]
35
heat
A [m ]
350
Steam
90F
20 lbm/s
73F
T1 Th ,in Tc,out 90 F 73 F = 17 F
T2 Th ,out Tc,in 90 F 60 F = 30 F
Tlm,CF
T1 T2
17 30
22.9 F
ln( T1 / T2 ) ln(17 / 30)
60F
Water
90F
and
Q
C p (Tout Tin )
5.396 10 6 Btu/h
4.15 10 5 lbm/h 115 lbm/s
(1.0 Btu/lbm.F)(73F 60F]
23-45
Tsteam [F]
80
82
84
86
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
104
106
108
110
112
114
116
118
120
Q [Btu/s]
810.5
951.9
1091
1228
1363
1498
1632
1766
1899
2032
2165
2297
2430
2562
2694
2826
2958
3089
3221
3353
3484
msteam[lbm/s]
0.7771
0.9127
1.046
1.177
1.307
1.436
1.565
1.693
1.821
1.948
2.076
2.203
2.329
2.456
2.583
2.709
2.836
2.962
3.088
3.214
3.341
23-46
mw [lbm/s]
62.34
73.23
83.89
94.42
104.9
115.2
125.6
135.8
146.1
156.3
166.5
176.7
186.9
197.1
207.2
217.4
227.5
237.6
247.8
257.9
268
3500
3.5
heat
Q [Btu/s]
2500
3
2.5
msteam
2000
1500
1.5
1000
500
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
msteam [lbm/s]
3000
0.5
120
Tsteam [F]
275
230
mw [lbm/s]
185
140
95
50
80
85
90
95
100
105
Tsteam [F]
23-47
110
115
120
Q
C p (Tout Tin )
940.5 kJ/s
9.5 kg/s
(2.48 kJ/kg.C)[(55C 15C]
The logarithmic mean temperature difference for counterflow arrangement and the correction factor F are
Glycerin
15C
T2 Th ,out Tc,in 55 C 15 C = 40 C
Tlm,CF
55C
T1 T2
45 40
42.5 C
ln( T1 / T2 ) ln(45 / 40)
t 2 t1 55 100
0.53
T1 t1 15 100
100C
F 0.77
Hot Water
5 kg/s
T T 15 55
R 1 2
0.89
t 2 t1 55 100
55C
Q
940.5 kW
30.6 kW/m 2 .C
As FTlm ,CF
(0.94 m 2 )(0.77)( 42.5C)
23-48
Air
28C
Isobutane
75C
2.7 kg/s
C p (Tout Tin )
690.39 kJ/s
(1.005 kJ/kg.C)(28C 21C)
= 98.14 kg/s
Air
21C
Tlm
T1 T2
54 47
50.4C
ln( T1 / T2 ) ln(54 / 47)
23-49
U = 571 W/m 2 .C
Water
200C
Th,out
Tlm
550F
Exhaust
gases
200C
(Eq.
1)
The rate of heat transfer can also be expressed as in the following forms
(Eq. 2)
(m
h fg ) water m
water (1941 kJ/kg ) (Eq. 3)
Q
We have three equations with three unknowns. Using an equation solver such as EES, the unknowns are
determined to be
Q 88.85 kW
Th,out 211.8 C
m water 0.0458 kg / s
23-50
Texhaust,in [C]
300
320
340
360
380
400
420
440
460
480
500
520
540
560
580
600
Q [kW]
25.39
30.46
35.54
40.62
45.7
50.77
55.85
60.93
66.01
71.08
76.16
81.24
86.32
91.39
96.47
101.5
Texhaust,out [C]
203.4
204.1
204.7
205.4
206.1
206.8
207.4
208.1
208.8
209.5
210.1
210.8
211.5
212.2
212.8
213.5
23-51
mw [kg/s]
0.01308
0.0157
0.01831
0.02093
0.02354
0.02616
0.02877
0.03139
0.03401
0.03662
0.03924
0.04185
0.04447
0.04709
0.0497
0.05232
110
214
100
212
temperature
Q [kW]
80
70
210
heat
60
208
50
206
40
204
30
20
300
350
400
450
500
202
600
550
Texhaust,in [C]
Texhaust,out [C]
90
0.055
0.05
0.045
mw [kg/s]
0.04
0.035
0.03
0.025
0.02
0.015
0.01
300
350
400
450
500
Texhaust,in [C]
23-52
550
600
Fresh
water
15C
Dyeing
water
and
Tlm
75C
(75 Tc,out ) (Th,out 15
)
T1 T2
Th,out
Tc,out
UA T
Q
s
lm
35 kW (0.625 kW/m 2 .C)(1.65 m 2 )
(Eq. 1)
(Eq. 2)
(Eq. 3)
water
water
We have three equations with three unknowns. Using an equation solver such as EES, the unknowns are
determined to be
Tc,out 41.4 C
Th,out 49.3 C
m 0.317 kg / s
23-53
23-72C The heat transfer in a heat exchanger will reach its maximum value when the hot fluid is cooled
to the inlet temperature of the cold fluid. Therefore, the temperature of the hot fluid cannot drop below the
inlet temperature of the cold fluid at any location in a heat exchanger.
23-73C The heat transfer in a heat exchanger will reach its maximum value when the cold fluid is heated
to the inlet temperature of the hot fluid. Therefore, the temperature of the cold fluid cannot rise above the
inlet temperature of the hot fluid at any location in a heat exchanger.
23-74C The fluid with the lower mass flow rate will experience a larger temperature change. This is clear
from the relation
Q m c C p Tcold m h C p Thot
23-75C The maximum possible heat transfer rate is in a heat exchanger is determined from
Q max Cmin (Th,in Tc,in )
where Cmin is the smaller heat capacity rate. The value of Q max does not depend on the type of heat
exchanger.
23-54
UAs
UAs
heat transfer coefficient and As is the heat transfer surface area of the heat exchanger. For specified values
of U and Cmin, the value of NTU is a measure of the heat exchanger surface area As. Because the
effectiveness increases slowly for larger values of NTU, a large heat exchanger cannot be justified
economically. Therefore, a heat exchanger with a very large NTU is not necessarily a good one to buy.
23-81C The value of effectiveness increases slowly with a large values of NTU (usually larger than 3).
Therefore, doubling the size of the heat exchanger will not save much energy in this case since the
increase in the effectiveness will be very small.
23-82C The value of effectiveness increases rapidly with a small values of NTU (up to about 1.5).
Therefore, tripling the NTU will cause a rapid increase in the effectiveness of the heat exchanger, and thus
saves energy. I would support this proposal.
23-55
95C
Air
10C
3 kg/s
1 kg/s
which is the smaller of the two heat capacity rates. Then the maximum heat transfer rate becomes
Q
max C min (Th ,in Tc ,in ) (3015 W/ C)(95C - 10C) = 256, 275 W 256.3 kW
The outlet temperatures of the cold and the hot streams in this limiting case are determined to be
Q
256.275 kW
10C +
95C
Cc
3.015 kW/ C
Q
256.275 kW
95C
33.8C
Ch
4.19 kW/ C
Tc ,out Tc ,in
Th,out Th,in
23-56
Analysis The heat capacity rates of the hot and cold fluids are
Ch m h C ph (0.2 kg / s)(2200 J / kg. C) 440 W/ C
Cc m c C pc (0.1 kg / s)(4180 J / kg. C) 418 W/ C
Therefore,
Cmin Cc 418 W/ C
and
Water
18C
0.1 kg/s
Cmin 418
0.95
Cmax 440
NTU
UAs
(340 W/m 2 .C) (2.04 m 2 )
1.659
C min
418 W/C
Then the effectiveness of this heat exchanger corresponding to C = 0.95 and NTU = 1.659 is determined
from Fig. 23-26d to be
= 0.61
Then the actual rate of heat transfer becomes
Q
Q
max (0.61)(59.36 kW) 36.2 kW
Finally, the outlet temperatures of the cold and hot fluid streams are determined to be
Q
36.2 kW
18C +
104.6C
Cc
0.418 kW / C
Q
36.2 kW
160C
77.7C
Ch
0.44 kW/ C
Tc ,out Tc ,in
Q C h (Th,in Th,out )
Th,out Th,in
23-57
Q
Q
max
80 C 45 C
0.583
80 C 20 C
23-86E Inlet and outlet temperatures of the hot and cold fluids in a double-pipe heat exchanger are given.
It is to be determined the fluid, which has the smaller heat capacity rate and the effectiveness of the heat
exchanger.
Analysis Hot water has the smaller heat capacity rate since it experiences a greater temperature change.
The effectiveness of this heat exchanger is determined from
Q
Q max
C h (Th,in Th,out )
C min (Th,in Tc ,in )
23-58
220F 100F
0.8
220F 70F
Chemical
and
20C
3 kg/s
Hot Water
110C
2 kg/s
Cmin 5.40
0.646
Cmax 8.36
NTU
UAs
(1.2 kW/m 2 .C) (7 m 2 )
1.556
C min
5.4 kW/ C
Then the effectiveness of this parallel-flow heat exchanger corresponding to C = 0.646 and NTU=1.556
is determined from
0.56
1 C
1 0.646
110 C
77.4C
Ch
8.36 kW/C
Tc ,out Tc ,in
Th ,out Th ,in
23-59
23-60
23-61
85
81
Tchemical,out [C]
77
73
69
65
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Tchemical,in [C]
110
100
Tw,out [C]
90
80
70
60
50
80
90
100
110
120
Tw,in [C]
23-62
130
140
150
Water
20C, 4 kg/s
and
Cmin
9.09
0.544
Cmax 16.72
Hot Air
100C
9 kg/s
NTU = 1.5
Then the surface area of this heat exchanger becomes
NTU
UAs
NTU C min (1.5)(9.09 kW/ C)
As
52.4 m 2
2
C min
U
0.260 kW/m .C
23-63
Water
17C
3 kg/s
120C
Steam
Tlm
T1 T2
40 103
66.6C
ln(T1 / T2 ) ln(40 /103)
80C
pc
c ,out
c ,in
As =
Q
790.02 kW
=
= 13.18 m 2
2
UTlm
0.9 kW/m .C)(66.6C)
As DL L
As
13.18 m 2
167.8 m
D (0.025 m)
min
h ,in
c ,in
Q
790.02 kW
0.61
Qmax 129162
. kW
The NTU of this heat exchanger is determined using the relation in Table 23-5 to be
NTU ln(1 ) ln(1 0.61) 0.942
The surface area is
NTU
UAs
NTU C min (0.942)(12.54 kW/C)
As
13.12 m 2
2
C min
U
0.9 kW/m .C
As DL L
As
13.12 m 2
167 m
D (0.025 m)
23-64
12.8C
UAs
(320 W/m 2 .C)(6.2 m 2 )
The outlet temperature of the hot fluid can be determined as follows
Tlm
12.8C
ln(T1 / T2 ) ln[42 /(Th ,out 78)]
Th ,out 79.8 C
whose solution is
Q
25,380 W
0.287 kg/s
C p (Th ,in Th,out ) ( 2200 J/kg.C)(120C 79.8C)
1 e NTU
UAs
(320 W/m 2 .C)(6.2 m 2 )
, kg/s)(2200 J/kg.C)
C min
(m
where
NTU
and
C (T
Q
h
h ,in Th , out ) 25,380 W
m
2200(120 Th ,out ) 25,380 W
Q
Also
120 Th,out
120 78
1 e
6.2320
2200
m
(2)
23-65
(1)
Cmin 303
0.725
Cmax 418
Cold Water
22C
0.1 kg/s
Q
max C min (Th ,in Tc ,in )
(303 W/ C)(90C - 22C) 20,604 kW
Hot Air
90C
As DL ( )(0.012 m)(12 m) 0.45 m 2 0.3 kg/s
Then the NTU of this heat exchanger becomes
NTU
UAs
(80 W/m 2 .C) (0.45 m 2 )
0.119
C min
303 W/C
The effectiveness of this counter-flow heat exchanger corresponding to C = 0.725 and NTU = 0.119 is
determined using the relation in Table 23-5 to be
1 exp[ NTU (1 C )]
1 exp[ 0119
. (1 0.725)]
0108
.
1 C exp[ NTU (1 C )] 1 0.725 exp[ 0119
. (1 0.725)]
23-66
mw [kg/s]
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
23-67
33
83
82.9
30.8
82.8
82.7
82.6
26.4
82.5
Tair,out
24.2
82.4
Tw,out
22
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
mw [kg/s]
23-68
0.8
82.3
1
Tair,out [C]
Tw,out [C]
28.6
33
88
32
86
Tw,out [C]
30
Tw,out
29
82
28
27
Tair,out
26
80
78
25
24
5
84
13
17
L [m]
23-69
21
76
25
Tair,out [C]
31
Q
511.9 Btu/s
70 F
240.6 F
c C pc
m
(3 lbm/s)(1.0 Btu/lbm. F)
Tc ,out Tc ,in
Cold Water
70F
3 lbm/s
Hot Oil
Tlm
105F
300F
T1 T2
59.4 35
46.1F 5 lbm/s
ln(T1 / T2 ) ln(59.4 /35)
Q = UAs Tlm
U =
Q
511.9 Btu/s
=
= 2.12 Btu/s.ft 2 .F
As Tlm
(1 / 12 m )(20 ft)(46.1F)
(b) The heat capacity rates of the hot and cold fluids are
Ch m h C ph (5 lbm / s)(0.525 Btu / lbm. F) 2.625 Btu / s. F
Cc m c C pc (3 lbm / s)(1.0 Btu / lbm. F) 3.0 Btu / s. F
Therefore, Cmin Ch 2.625 Btu / s. F and C
Cmin 2.625
0.875
Cmax
3.0
min
h ,in
c ,in
Q
Q
max
5119
.
0.85
603.75
The NTU of this heat exchanger is determined using the relation in Table 23-3 to be
NTU
1
1
0.85 1
1
ln
ln
4.28
C 1 C 1
0.875 1 0.85 0.875 1
As DL (1 / 12 ft )( 20 ft ) 5.24 ft 2
and
NTU
UAs
NTU C min (4.28)( 2.625 Btu/s.F)
U
2.14 Btu/s.ft 2 .F
2
C min
As
5.24 ft
23-70