Individual Performance Commitment Review Form

Name of Employee: LADY AIRISH D. NICDAO

Name of Rater: NELIA C. DIPASUPIL
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Position:
Teacher III
Position: Master Teacher II
Rating
Period:
June
2015-March
2016
Date of Review:
MFO
KRAs
OBJECTIVES
TIMELIN
WEIGHT
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Bureau/Center/Service/ Division: Department
of
Education
E
Per
OBJECTI
QUALITY
VE
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

MFO

Basic
Educati
on
Service
s

KRAs

I.
Instructio
nal
Planning

II.
Instructio
nal
Delivery

OBJECTIVES
C.
To
formulate
intervention
programs in
Science and
A.
To prepare
Health
6 and
daily
lesson
MSEP
6 for
plan
using the
learners
BEC
2010
development
Curriculum,
Implemented
effective
at least two
strategies,
(2)
resources,
and
intervention
data
to
meet
programs
the needs of all
pupils
A. To engage
pupils in
learning by
using a
variety of
instructional
strategies in
order to meet
individual
learning
B.
To prepare
needs
Action Plan in
Science and
Health 6 and
MSEP 6 for an
organized
teaching and
learning
B. To provide
assistance to
pupils needing
remediation/
reinforcement

TIMELI
June
NE
2016
March
2017
June
2016March
2017

June
2016
March
2017
June
2016
March
2017

WEIGHT
(10)
Per
OBJECTI
VE
30%
(10)

30%
(10)

(10)

(10)
June
2016
March
2017

EFFICIENCY

PERFORMANCE
5 100% accomplishments
on the INDICATORS
following supported by evidences
such as actionQUALITY
plan of intervention
EFFICIENCY
programs, pre/post evaluation
reports and performance tracking
Used pupil learning data to
system.
4 Allguide
mechanisms
planningare present
except
for some
minimal
Planned
time
realistically for
requirements.
pacing, content, mastery, and
3 Alltransitions
mechanisms are present but
without
evidences.
Planned
for differentiated
2 Incomplete
mechanisms and
instruction
absence
of
reports.
Aligned lesson objectives to
1 Mechanisms
and reports
DepEds curriculum
andare
pupil
missing.
learning needs
Developed Individual Pupil
Development
Engaged andPlan
maintained
pupils
in
active
learning
5-All indicators were
met
4-4
Differentiated
instruction
to
indicators were met
meet
the
pupils
needs
3-3 indicators were met
2-2
Used
a variety
of effective
indicators
were
met
instructional
strategies
and
1-only
1 indicator
was met
resources
(Evidences:
Pupils Portfolio, Budget
Used
technology
to enhance
of Work,
Instructional
Materials,
Lesson pupil
Plan, learning
Individual Pupil
Development
Plan)learning goals
Reinforced
consistently throughout the
Specific
lessonstarget/activities were
included
5-All indicators
in the Action
were met
Plan
4-4 indicators
were
meton
Plans
made were
based
3-3 indicators were met
data/evidence
2-2 indicators
were met
Prepared
accompanying
1-only
1
indicator
was met
standards/ coverage on
5 100%
accomplishments
matters
pertaining to on the
following
supported
by evidences
curriculum
implementation,
such as
documents,
materials used
and
for pupil development
for remedial
teaching/reinforcement,
Evaluation
mechanisms for
record
of
pupils
suggested performance,
plans were present
attendance sheet

TIMELINESS

TIMELINESS

TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION
ACTUA RATIN SCOR
L
G
E
RESUL
TS
TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION
ACTUA RATIN SCOR
L
G
E
RESUL
TS

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

MFO

KRAs

III.
Assessme
nt of Pupil
Academic
Progress

OBJECTIVES

TIMELIN
E

WEIGHT
Per
OBJECTI
VE

C. To
prepare/condu
ct basic action
research/
innovation

August
2016
March
2017

(10)

A. To gather,
analyze, and
use all relevant
data to
measure pupil
academic
progress,
guide
instructional
content and
delivery
methods, and
provide timely
feedback to
both pupils
and parents
throughout the
school year

June
2016
March
2017

30%
(10)

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
QUALITY
5 Conducted/ Implemented an
approved basic action research
4 Action Research Proposal/
Innovation approved by the Division
Committee
3 - Action Research Proposal/
Innovation approved by the District
Committee
2 - Action Research Proposal/
Innovation approved by the School
Committee
1 Conceptualized an Action
Research/ innovation

Used pre-assessment data to

develop expectations for
pupils, to differentiate
instruction and to document
learning
Used a variety of assessment
strategies and instruments
that are valid and appropriate
for the content and for the
pupil
Used assessment tools for
both formative and summative
purposes that report final
mastery in relationship to
content goals and objectives
Communicated with the
parents through Homeroom
PTA meetings for feed backing
on pupils learning
Gave constructive and
frequent feedback to pupils on
their learning
5-All indicators were met
4-4 indicators were met
3-3 indicators were met

EFFICIENCY

TIMELINESS

TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION
ACTUA RATIN SCOR
L
G
E
RESUL
TS

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

MFO

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELIN
E

WEIGHT
Per
OBJECTI
VE

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

QUALITY
B. To construct
assessment
tools in
measuring
pupils
academic
progress
congruent to
the learning
objectives and
budget of work

June
2016
Februar
y 2017

(10)

(10)

C. To produce
acceptable,
measurable
and
appropriate
pupil academic
progress
through the
work of the
teacher

TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION

Constructed assessment
tools for formative,
summative and quarterly
assessment
Table of Specifications were
provided
Keys to correction were
provided
Assessment tools were
congruent to the learning
objectives
Assessment tools were
aligned to the Budget of
Work

5-All indicators were met

4-4 indicators were met
3-3 indicators were met
2-2 indicators were met
1-only 1 indicator was met
(Evidences: Formative, summative
and quarterly assessment tools)

Set acceptable, measurable,

and appropriate achievement
goals for pupil learning
progress based on baseline
data
Documented the progress of
each student throughout the
year
Provided evidence that goals
have been met
Used available performance

EFFICIENCY

ACTUA
L
RESUL
TS
TIMELINESS

RATIN
G

SCOR
E

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

MFO

KRAs

IV. Plus
Factor

OBJECTIVES

A. To establish
support and
cooperation of
HPTA in
various
projects for the
best interest of
the pupils

TIMELIN
E

June
2015
May
2016

WEIGHT
Per
OBJECTI
VE
10%
(2.5)

(2.5)

B. To serve as
school
coordinator in
Science and
Health
(5)

C. To serve as
coach of
students on
contests in the
district level

TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
QUALITY
Solicited and raised funds
amounting
5 P10,000.00
4 P7,000.00
3 P5,000.00
2 P3,000.00
1 P1,000.00
Roles and functions were identified
in and tasks accomplished
5 100% of the task
4 81 to 99% of the task
3 61 to 80% of the task
2 51 to 60% of the task
1 50% and below of the task
Roles and functions were identified
in and tasks accomplished
5 100% of the task
4 81 to 99% of the task
3 61 to 80% of the task
2 51 to 60% of the task
1 50% and below of the task

EFFICIENCY

TIMELINESS

ACTUA
L
RESUL
TS

RATIN
G

SCOR
E

Prepared by:
LADY AIRISH D. NICDAO
Ratee

Recommending Approval:
NELIA C. DIPASUPIL
Master Teacher II
Rater

Approved:
ROSARIO S. CANLAS

School Principal II