See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267559093

Incidence of Retained Placenta in Relation with

Breed, Age, Parity and Body Condition Score of
Dairy cows

Article June 2012

DOI: 10.3329/ijns.v2i1.10878

CITATIONS READS

7 47

4 authors, including:

Md.Hemayatul Islam
University of Rajshahi
45 PUBLICATIONS 159 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Md.Hemayatul Islam
letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 22 November 2016
 pISSN : 2221-1012
International Journal of Natural Sciences (2012), 2(1):15-20
eISSN : 2221-1020
www.ijns.net
___________________________________________________________________________

Incidence of Retained Placenta in Relation with Breed, Age, Parity and Body Condition
Score of Dairy cows

Islam MH*, Sarder MJU, Rahman M, Kader MA and Islam MA

Department of Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Rajshahi,
Bangladesh.

[Received: February 7, Accepted: March 29, 2012]

ABSTRACT
Retained placenta is an economically important reproductive disorder which occurs at the end of the reproductive cycle and has
repercussions on the next. The study was conducted a total 1205 dairy cows from 9 upazila and 4 Metro Thana of Rajshahi during the period
from July 2010 to June 2011. To evaluate the incidence of retained placenta in relation to breed, age, parity and body condition score of
dairy cows. A questionnaire was prepared including information viz. name and address of farmer, breed, age; parity and body condition
score for achievement of the study. The overall prevalence of retained placenta was 13.4%. The influencing factors including breed, age,
parity, body condition score had significant effect (P<0.05) on retained placenta. The highest prevalence was 10.7%, 4.5%, 5.6% and 7.1%
observed in cross-breed, > 3 years age, 1st parity and fair body condition group of cows, respectively. From this study, it might be concluded
that local breed, 3 years but less than 5 years age group, 3rd parity had least risk for retained placenta.

Key words: Incidence, retained placenta, age, parity, body condition and dairy cows.

INTRODUCTION after second and third calving, 10-21% after fourth

and fifth ones [10]. There is no available data on
Livestock is an integral part of agriculture in our retained placenta in dairy cows at Rajshahi district.
country. Cattle are the important species of livestock The present study has been taken to evaluate the
in Bangladesh. Cattle is an important factor in prevalence of retained placenta in dairy cows on
agricultural operation which provides valuable food different factors at Rajshahi district in Bangladesh.
of animal origin like milk, meat, milk products;
industrial raw materials like skin and manures. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Diseases of dairy cattle substantially limit production
performances. Among the reproductive diseases The study area and data collection: The study was
retained placenta is an important reproductive conducted a total 1205 calvings from 1205 dairy
cyclical problem that has repercussions on the next cows from 9 upazila and 4 Metro Thana of Rajshahi.
calving [1]. A retained placenta usually causes the The name of 9 upazilas were viz., Poba, Godagari,
cow to delay the next pregnancy for 2-6 months, late Tanor, Mohonpur, Bagmara, Puthia, Durgapur,
calving date in the following year and may result in Bagha and Charghat and 4 Metro Thanas namely
an open cow next year [2]. A six-month delay may Boalia, Rajpara, Motihar and Shamukhdum at
result in an open cow next year at pregnancy Rajshahi district in Bangladesh during the period
checking time. The tetanus, an important from July 2010 to June 2011. A structural
complication of retained placenta, caused by questionnaire prepared for collecting the information
Clostridium tetani which can be found in the soil or and estimates the incidence of retained placenta in
in the feces and gets into the uterus where it set up an relation with age, parity and body weight and body
infection resulting lockjaw [3]. In dairy cows, retained condition of dairy cows. The data collected directly
placenta may be the cause of serious economic losses from owner of dairy farms and register books of
in the herd due to decreased milk production, illness government and private farms.
and treatment cost, beside a decreased market value of
the animal [4, 5]. There are many factors influencing
the incidence of retained fetal membranes like Management of cows: In experimental, the
abortion, dystocia, multiple birth, poor body individual cow owners were housed their cows were
condition score, age, nutritional deficiencies, traditional housing and most of them feeding straw
hormonal imbalance [6, 7]. Aged cows showed a and green grass, few concentrate feeding and little
higher incidence [8] of retained fetal membrane than feeding balanced diet; very few were deworming and
4, 5, 6, 7 years old [9]. The number of calving was vaccinating their cows and most of the farmer were
negatively correlated with the incidence of retained not waiting more than twelve hours for placental
fetal membrane. A higher incidence (44.7%) affected come out, after one to two hours they called doctors
the heifers and their calving while it was 10-13% for manually removed. But mini and large sized

*Corresponding author: [email protected]

15
Int J Nat Sci (2012), 2(1):15-20 Islam et al.

dairy farmer had improved practiced on rearing, health condition the lumber vertebral processes of the
feeding, deworming and vaccination. When the cows cows were used as landmark. The body condition of the
prior to calved most of our farmer fed their animals cows were divided into three classes such as- Group 1:
worm rice gruel and separated from others animal Poor (n=181), Group 2: Fair (n=746) and Group 3:
with paddy straw bedding were used. Good (n=278)
Table 1: The Incidence of retained placenta among
cross and indigenous dairy cows.

Breed Type Chi- Square (2)

Placental Chi- Square(2)
Total Calculated value
condition tabulated value
Local Cross-bred (P<0.05)

33 129 162
Retained
(2.7%) 10.7%) (13.4%)

Normally 437 606 1043

27.315* 3.841
Expelled (36.3%) (50.3%) (86.6%)

470 735 1205

Total
(39.0%) (61.0%) (100%)

Grouping of Experimental Cows: To achieve the Where,

goal animals were group according to following Poor = Marked emaciated.
considering factors: Fair = Ribs are usually visible, little fat
covered dorsal spines are barely visible.
Breed- The cows was classified in Indigenous or Good = Animals are smooth and well covered
Local (n = 470) and Crossbred (n = 735). but fat deposits are not marked.

Age- The age cows were determined from birth Statistical analysis:
register and examined by teeth and cornual ring The data were compiled; SPSS program [11] to
reading. After confirmation of age of these cows and analyze the incidence and chi-square method used
then classified as follows- Group I: < 3 years for interpretation of the findings. Retention of
(n=295), Group II: 3- <5 years (n=430), Group III: placenta (retained placenta, fetal membrane or
5 - <7 years (n=291) and Group IV: > 7 years afterbirth) was defined in this study as failure of
(n=189). spontaneous expulsion of the placenta within 12
hours after parturition.
Parity- The cows those gave 1st calf considered as
parity 1 (P1), those gave 2nd calf consider as parity 2
(P2), 3rd calf as parity 3 (P3) and so on.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The overall incidence of retained placenta was 13.4%
Table 2: Effect of age on Incidence of retained which was closer to various researchers and their
placenta of dairy cows incidence were12.6% [12], 10.0% [13] and 8.8% [14] but
differ from results were 7.0% [6], 1.96% [15] and 7.1%
Body Condition Score (BCS) - In order to record the [16]
respectively.

Placental Age group Chi- Square

Chi- Square
condition (2)
Total (2) Calculated
3 years to 5 to < tabulated
<3 years > 7 years value (P<0.05).
< 5years 7years value

Retained 54 35 37 36 162
(4.5%) (2.9%) (3.1%) (3.0%) (13.4%)

Normally 241 395 254 153 1043

Expelled 21.621* 7.815
(20.0%) (32.8%) (21.1%) (12.7%) (86.6%)

Total 295 430 291 189 1205

(24.5%) (35.7%) (24.1%) (15.7%) (100%)

16
 Int J Nat Sci (2012), 2(1):15-20 Islam et al.

Table 3: The effects of parity on the Incidence of lowest incidence were in exotic and indigenous
retained placenta of dairy cows breed. Age had significance effects (P<0.05) on

Parity Chi- Square

Chi-
(2)
Placental Square(2)
Total Calculated
condition tabulated
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 value
value
(P<0.05).

68 23 12 26 9 24 162
Retained
(5.6%) (1.9%) (1.0%) (2.2%) (0.7%)(2.0%)(13.4%)

Normally 368 256 159 132 58 70 1043

27.323* 11.070
Expelled (30.5%)(21.2%) (13.2 %) (11.0%)(4.8%)(5.8%)(86.6%)

436 279 171 158 67 94 1205

Total
(36.2%)(23.2%) (14.2%) (13.2%)(5.6%)(7.8%)(100.0%)
The low incidence of retention of placenta could be incidence of retained placenta of dairy cows. The
due to the area, breed and indiscrimination of data incidence of retained placenta of dairy cows at
collection [17], hormonal imbalance [6], nutrition [18, 19] Rajshahi was in <3 yrs, 3 yrs to < 5yrs, 5 to < 7yrs
and genital infection [20, 21]. The influencing factors and > 7 yrs were 4.5%, 2.9%, 3.1% and 3.0%,
including breed, age, respectively. Sarder et.al. [14] observed 4.4%, 10.4%,
parity and body condition score on investigation of 8.7% and 5.5% the incidence of retained placenta
retained placenta. were in 4 years, 4 to 6 years, 6 to 8 years,
respectively. Ali [9] stated retained placenta with age
Breed had direct influence on retained placenta. of cows in <4yrs, 4-<7yrs, 7- <10 yrs and 10yrs were
Crossbred had higher (10.5%) incidence than 9.4%, 19.2, 38.1% and 51.9%, respectively. Azad [22]
indigenous (2.7%) one and significant effect also obtained rate of retained placenta in 3-5 yrs and
(P<0.05). Azad [22] reported retained placenta in 5yrs of age group of cows were 33.3% and 37.5%.
cross and local breed were 37.5% & 25.0%, The older aged (> 7 years) of cows had the highest
(4.5%) incidence of retained placenta than young (3
32.8%
60 Retained Normally Expelled

50.3%
% of placental condition

50
% of placental condition

40 36.3% 21.1%
20%

30

12.7%
20
10.7%
10
2.7% 4.5%
2.9% 3.1% 3%
0
Local Cross breed

Types of Breed
<3 yrs 3 to < 5yrs 5 to < 7yrs > 7 yrs
Figure 1: Graphical representation of percentages of
retained placenta in relation with breed of cows. Age

Figure 2: Cylinder bar diagram indicates the

proportion of placental condition and age group of
cows.

respectively but similar findings [9, 21, 23] that to 5 years) age and 5 to 7 years of age similar result
influences of retained placenta and the highest and showed by various authors [8, 9, 14, 16, 22, 24] and

17
Int J Nat Sci (2012), 2(1):15-20 Islam et al.

partially agreed with [25, 26] but they differ in heifer (> and 37.5% for treatment and control group,
3 years) group. respectively; Sarder [8] showed that retained
placenta occurred significantly higher in cows over
6th parity than 3rd parity. Stevenson and Call [28]
Table 4: The effects of body condition score on the reported that retained placenta increases with
Incidence of retained placenta of dairy cows advancing parity except in heifer. Similarly
Saloniemi et. al. [29] showed that the incidence of

Body Condition Score Chi- Square(2)

Placental Chi- Square(2)
Total Calculated value
condition Poor Fair Good tabulated value
(P<0.05).
37 86 39 162
Retained
(3.1%) (7.1%) (3.2%) (13.4%)

Normally 144 660 239 1043

10.052* 5.991
Expelled (12.0%) (54.8%) (19.8%) (86.6%)
181 746 278 1205
Total
(15.0%) (61.9%) (23.1%) (100%)
retention of foetal membranes, metritis and dystocia
* Significant at 5% level; P1=1st calving, P2=2ndcalving, was lowest in second party except 1st parity. From
P3=3rdcalving, P4=4thcalving, P5=5thcalving & P6=> 6th calving. the owners statement about 1st parity, it was known
that the majority of the animals had had their
The parity had significant effect (P<0.05) on premature delivery and history of the remaining
incidence of retained placenta of dairy cows. The animals was unknown. Grunert [6] stated that most of
highest occurrence of retained placenta was recorded the cases placental retention was occurred by
5.2% in first parity and decreasing 2.2% in 4th parity, disturbance of the loosening mechanism in the
2.0 in 6th parity %, 1.9% in 2nd parity, 1.0% in 3rd placentomes.
parity and 0.7% 5th parity. Most of researcher showed
similar results. Sarder et. al. [14] showed the Body condition had significant effect (P<0.05) on
incidence of retained placenta at 1st parity, 2nd parity, incidence of retained afterbirth of dairy cows. The
3rd parity, 4th parity, 5th parity and >6th parity ware present study showed 7.1%, 3.2% and 3.1% of
8.5%, 13.3%, 6.1%, 9.4%, 20% and 28.7%, incidence of retained placenta in fair, good and poor
respectively which is closer to this study. Gaafar et. condition of cows. Whereas Sarder et. al. [14]
al. [27] reported the incidence of retained placenta in reported that the prevalence of retained placenta was
Friesian cows increased significantly (P<0.05) from higher in good condition, lower in fair and other in
14.20% for 1st parity to 54.60% for 8th parity. Azad poor condition cows, respectively. These differences
[22]
reported the rates of retention of placenta was in may be due to several risk factors such as uterine
1st-2nd and 3rd 5th parity were 15.0%, 15%, 33.3% contractility, last calving type, body condition during

35 Retained Normally Expelled

% o f p l a c e n ta l c o n d i ti o n

Retained Normally Expelled

30.5%
30 60
% of placental condition

25 50
21.2%
20 40
15 13.2% 30
11%
20
10
5.6% 5.8%
4.8% 10
5 1.9% 2.2% 2%
1% 0.7% 0
0
P1
P1 P2
P P3
P3 P4P4 P5P5 P6
P6
Poor Fair Good
2

Parity of cows Body condition score of cows

Figure 3: Bar diagram demonstrate the percentages of
placental relation with parity of cows Figure 4: Bar diagram demonstrate the percentages of
placental relation with BCS group of cows.

18
Int J Nat Sci (2012), 2(1):15-20 Islam et al.

pregnancy, the time of onset of post partum oestrus, Retention of placenta. The Bangladesh
still birth, birth of twin, month and season of calving Veterinarian 14(1-2): 53-57.
[17]
, hereditary [30, 31], gestation length [6], dietary 10. Majeed AF, Aboud QM, Hassan MS and
deficiencies of carotene, vitamin A [19], progesterone
Muhammad AY (2009). Retained fetal membranes
and oestrogen imbalance at parturition [6], difficult
in Friesian-Hoistein cows and effect of some
delivery, age and parity of the cows [30] and other
treatment methods. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary
uterine infections, which predispose the cows to
Sciences 23: 5-8.
retention of after birth.
11. SPSS/PC, Windows for version-10.0. Release on
CONCLUSION 27.10.199 (Microsoft Corp). Trends. SPSS Inc.,
Michigan Avenue. Chicago. IL.pp:19-182.
The local breed, 3 to 5 years age group, 2nd and 3rd 12. Rahman MF, Hossain MS and Prodhan MAM
parity, good body condition score had less chance of (1993). Reproductive problems of cattle in
retention of placenta in dairy cows at Rajshahi Bangladesh. The Bangladesh Veterinarian 10:
district in Bangladesh. 71-73.
13. Francos G (1974). Observation on the
REFERENCES frequency of reproductive disorders in dairy
herds in Israel. Deutsche Tieraziliche
1. Joosten I, Stelwagen I and Dijkhuizen FA (1988). Wochenschrift 81: 135-138.
Economic and Reproductive consequences of 14. Sarder MJU, Moni MIZ and Aktar S (2010).
retained placenta in dairy cattle. The Veterinary Prevalence of reproductive disorders of crossbred
Record 123: 53-57. cows in the Rajshahi district of Bangladesh.
2. Borel N, Thoma R, Spaeni P, Weilenmann R, SAARC Journal of Agriculture 8(2): 65-75.
TeanKum K and Brugnera E (2006). Chlamydia- 15. Moller K, Newling PF, Robson HJ, Jansen GS,
related abortion in cattle from Graubunden. Meurbinge JA and Copper MG (1967). Retained
Switzerland Veterinary Pathology 43:702-708. placental membrane in dairy herds in the Huntly
3. John Maas (2008). Treating and Preventing district. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 15: 111-
Retained Placenta in Beef Cattle UCD Veterinary 116.
Views, California Cattlemens Magazine. 16. Kaikini AS, Chikalikar GK and Dindorkar CV
4. Ahmed WM, El-Ekhnawy KI, Desouky HM, (1983). Reproductive disorders in Holstein Gir
Zaabal MM and Ahmed YF (1999). F1 crossbred cows. Indian Journal of Animal
Investigations on retained fetal membranes in Science 53(5): 556-558.
Friesian cows in Egypt. Egyptian Journal of 17. Shamsuddin M, Alam MGS and Ahmed JU
Comparative Pathology and Clinical Pathology (1988). Reproductive disorders of crossbred
12: 160-177. cows. Bangladesh Veterinary Journal 22: 21-28.
5. Semacan A and Servinc M (2005). Liver 18. Romaniuk J (1978). Fertility indices in dairy
function in cows with retained placenta. cows retained placenta. Bulletin of the
Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Veterinary Institute, Pulawy, Poland 22: 54-59.
Sciences 29: 775-778.
19. Ishak MA, Larson LL, Owen FG, Lowry SR and
6. Grunert E (1986). Etiology and pathogenesis of Erickson ED (1983). Effect of selenium, vitamins
bovine retained placenta. In: Current Therapy in and ration on placental retention and performance
Theriogenology. Edt. Morrow DA. 2nd ed. W13 of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 66: 99-
Saunders Co. Philadelphia, London. pp. 237-242. 106.
7. Alam MGS and Dobson H (1986). Postpartum 20. Muller LD and Owens MJ (1974). Factors
release of Prostaglandins F2 alpha (PGF2) and associated with the incidence of retained placenta.
the effect of oestradiol benzoate on the Journal of Dairy Science 57: 721-728.
concentration of PGF2 metabolite in postpartum
and normal cyclic cows. Bangladesh Veterinary 21. Arthur GH, Noakes DE and Pearson H (1989).
Journal 20: 73-81. Retention of fetal membrane. in: Veterinary
Reproduction and Obstetrics. 5th ed. Bailliere
8. Sarder MJU (2008). Occurrence of reproductive Tindall, London pp. 24 1-252.
disorders in crossbred cows of Northern
Bangladesh. 15th International Congress on 22. Azad MA (2010). Prevention of retained placenta
Biotechnology in Animal Reproduction, by injecting various drugs immediately after
Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh parturition in cows. MS Thesis, Department of
p.74 Surgery and Obstetrics, Faculty of Veterinary
Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University,
9. Ali ML (1997). Retrospective epidemiologic Mymensingh. pp.1-48.
study of periparturient diseases in dairy cows. 3. 23. Samad MA, Rahman MH and Islam TS (1989).
Factors associated with placental retention in

19
Int J Nat Sci (2012), 2(1):15-20 Islam et al.

Savar dairy cattle. Indian Journal of Dairy 28. Stevenson JS and Call EP (1988). Reproductive
Science 42: 720-723. disorders in the parturient dairy cow. Journal of
24. Pandit RK, Shukla SP and Parekh HK (1981). Dairy Science 71: 2572-2583.
Incidence of retained placenta in Gir cows and their 29. Saloniemi H, Grohn Y and Syvajarvi J (1986).
crosses with special references to subsequent An epidemiological and genetic study on
fertility. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 51: 505- registered diseases in Finnish Ayrshire cattle. It
507. Reproductive disorders. Acta Veterinary
Scandinevia 27: 196-208. (Cited: Animal
25. Curds CR, Erb HN, Sniffen CJ, Smith RD and
Breeding Abstracts 55: 2020).
Kronfeld DS (1985). Path analysis of dry period
nutrition, postpartum metabolic and reproductive 30. Dryendahl L, Mattson J and Peherson B (1977).
disorders, and mastitis in Holstein cows. Journal Retained Placenta in cattle incidence, clinical data
of Dairy Science 68(9): 2347-2360. and effects on fertility. Journal of the American
Veterinary Medical Association 24: 529-541.
26. Erb HN and Martin SW (1980). Interrelationships
between production and reproductive diseases in 31. Fonseca FA, Britt JH, McDaniel BT, Wilk JC and
Holstein cows: Age and seasonal patterns. Rakes AH (1983). Reproductive traits of
Journal of Dairy Science 63(11): 1918-1924. Holsteins and Jerseys. In: Effects of age, milk
yield, and clinical abnormalities on involution of
27. Gaafar HMA, Shamiah ShMA, Shitta A and Ganah
cervix and uterus, ovulation, estrous cycles,
HAB (2010). Factors affecting retention of placenta
detection of estrus, conception rate, and days
and its influence on postpartum reproductive
performance and milk production in Friesian cows. open. Journal of Dairy Science 66: 11281147.
Slovak Journal of animal science 4(1): 6 - 12.

20