Course Syllabus (Educ. 8)

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are the mandate, vision, mission, goals and objectives of the institution as well as the goals and objectives of the College of Education.

The goals are quality instruction, relevance and responsiveness, human resource development, and linkages and infrastructure development. The objectives are to produce quality graduates, conduct research, offer responsive courses, promote entrepreneurship, and strengthen opportunities, facilities, and linkages.

The goals are to develop competent teachers with Filipino values and culture who can help develop the nation using educational technology. The objectives are to prepare high school teachers and translate learning capabilities using science and technology.

Republic of the Philippines

Iloilo State College of Fisheries


COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
J.T. Bretaa St., Barotac Nuevo, Iloilo

COURSE SYLLABUS
Date of Revision: Second Semester, S.Y. 2015-2016

Course Name Assessment of student Learning 2 (Educ. 8)


Course Credits 3 units
Course Description This course focuses on the development and utilization of alternative forms of assessment in
measuring authentic learning. Emphasis is given to ways in assessing process and product-oriented
targets as well as effective learning. Students will experience how to develop rubrics for
performance-based and portfolio assessment.
Contact Hours/Week 3 hours
Prerequisite Educ. 6
Course Objectives At the end of the course, you will be able to:
a. analyze the fundamental concepts and characteristics of 21st century assessment.
b. apply the principles in constructing and interpreting performance-based assessment.
c. developing instruments for assessing affective learning.
d. develop a portfolio as an assessment tool.
e. demonstrate skills in interpreting test results and reporting grades.

Mandate, vision, mission, goals and objectives


Mandate:
The Iloilo State College of Fisheries provides professional, vocational, technological, and advance studies in fisheries, agriculture, maritime
transportation, education, entrepreneurship and science and technology, and promote research, extension and production in these areas.

Vision:
ISCOF as a premier academic institution in Southeast Asia.
Mission:
To upgrade quality education, generate jobs, and alleviate poverty through excellent academic programs.

Core Values:
Fortitude
Integrity
Scholarship
Humanity
Excellence
Service

Goals:
Quality instruction;
Relevance and responsiveness;
Human resource development; and
Linkages and infrastructure development.

Objectives:
a) Produce quality graduates who will contribute to the advancement of their chosen field;
b) Conduct viable researches, develop and disseminate technologies, and provide technical assistance to the community for an increased
production;
c) Offer courses that are responsive to the needs of the community and industries for national development;
d) Promote self-employment and entrepreneurship;
e) Strengthen opportunities for student scholarships and access to quality education;
f) Promote faculty and staff development;
g) Strengthen and develop linkages with other agencies or institutions to achieve both in the national and international levels; and
h) Improve facilities and structures that will efficiently and effectively carry out quality instruction, research and development, extension and
production.
Goals of the College of Education:
To develop competent teachers who are imbued with positive values and rich ideals of Filipino life and culture and are responsive to a sound
educational technology that could help hasten the social, economic, and ecological development of the nation especially Western Visayas.

Objectives of the College of Education:


1. Prepare and train future high school teachers to mold the students to be men and women of integrity, intellectual power, physical strength and
spiritual influence.
2. Translate learning capabilities into distinctive knowledge and information by actively responding and adopting science and technology in the
dissemination and actualization of relevant instructional techniques.

Learning Outcome
Intended Learning Course Content/ Teaching Learning Assessment Resource Time
Textbooks/References
Outcome (ILO) Subject Matter Activities (TLAs) Task Materials Table
1. Discuss the vision, ISCOFs VMMGO and Basic Reading:
mission, mandate and CoEds goals and Course Syllabus Discussion Oral Recitation ISCOF Flyers 1 hour
goals of the institution and objectives and CoEd
goals and objectives of the Bulletin of
college of education. Grading System and Information
Course Requirements
2. Explain the grading
system and the other
requirements.
At the end of the lesson, Unit I. 21st Century
the students are expected Assessment Basic Reading: Class Discussion Short Quiz Reference book 2 hours
to: 1. Characteristics of Cajigal, R.M. and Mantuano, M.D. Assigned Reading Recitation
1. Use appropriate 21st Century (2014). Assessment of Student Learning Partner Learning Brainstorming Multi-media
assessment tools and Assessment 2. Adriana Publishing Company, Q.C. Presentation
techniques as applied in 2. Instructional
instructional decision. Decisions in Internet Sources:
2. Relate learning Assessment http://www.teaching.utoronto.ca/topics/
outcomes and assessment. 3. Outcome-Based coursedesign/learning-outcome
Assessment
At the end of the lesson, Unit II. Types of Basic Reading:
the students are Assessment Cajigal, R.M. and Mantuano, M.D. Lecture Short Quiz Multi-media 4 hours
expected to: 1. Traditional and (2014). Assessment of Student Learning Class Discussion Recitation presentation
1. Distinguish the Authentic Assessment 2. Adriana Publishing Company, Q.C. Reporting Brainstorming Materials over
different types of 2. Formative Evaluation the internet
assessment and relate it and Summative
to learning outcomes. Evaluation Internet Sources:
3. Norm and Criterion- www.eric.ed.gov
Referenced Assessment
4. Contextualized and
Decontextualized
Assessment
5. Analytic and Holistic
Assessment
At the end of the lesson, Unit III. Nature of Basic Reading:
students are expected to: Performance-Based Cajigal, R.M. and Mantuano, M.D. Discussion Short Quiz Illustrations 2 hours
1. Analyze the nature Assessment (PBA) (2014). Assessment of Student Learning Recitation Multi-media
and essential 1. Meaning and 2. Adriana Publishing Company, Q.C. Oral Presentation Brainstorming presentation
characteristics of Characteristics
performance-based 2. Types of
assessment. Performance Tasks
3. Strengths and
Limitation
Midterm Examination
At the end of the lesson, Unit IV. Designing Basic Reading:
students are expected to: Meaningful Performance- Cajigal, R.M. and Mantuano, M.D. Lecture-Discussion Short Quiz Illustrations 3 hours
1. Develop a portfolio of Based Assessment (2014). Assessment of Student Recitation Multi-media
performance-based 1. Designing the Purpose of Learning 2. Adriana Publishing Brainstorming presentation
assessment tools that Assessment Company, Q.C.
measures learners 2. Identifying Performance
competencies of a given Tasks
subject. 3. Developing Scoring
Schemes
At the end of the lesson, Unit V. Affective Basic Reading:
students are expected to: Learning Cajigal, R.M. and Mantuano, M.D. Lecture-Discussion Short Quiz Illustrations 3 hours
1. Craft affective learning Competencies (2014). Assessment of Student Learning Recitation Multi-media
outcome for the different 1. Importance of 2. Adriana Publishing Company, Q.C. Brainstorming presentation
levels in the affective Affective Learning
domain Competencies Internet Sources:
2. Affective Traits and http://ets.tlt.psu.edu/learningdesign/
Learning Targets assessment/affective
3. Affective Domain of
the Taxonomy of
Educational Objectives
At the end of the lesson, Unit VI. Development Basic Reading:
students are expected to: of Affective Cajigal, R.M. and Mantuano, M.D. Lecture-Discussion Short Quiz Illustrations 3 hours
1. Construct instruments Assessment Tools (2014). Assessment of Student Learning Recitation Multi-media
for measuring the 1. Methods of Assessing 2. Adriana Publishing Company, Q.C. Brainstorming presentation
different levels in the Affective Targets
affective domain 2. Utilizing the Different Internet Sources:
Methods or Combination http://www.teaching.utoronto.ca/topics/
of Method in Assessing coursedesign/learning-
Affect outcome/characteristics.htm
FINAL EXAMINATION
Suggested Readings and References Cajigal, R.M. and Mantuano, M.D. (2014). Assessment of Student Learning 2. Adriana Publishing Company, Q.C.
Navarro, R.L. and Santos, R.D. (2013). Authentic Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes, 2nd Edition, Lorimar Publishing
Course Requirements Projects/Portfolio/Output
Attendance
Oral Reports/Recitations
Major Exams
Grading System Attendance -------------------------- 15%
Reports/Recitations ---------------- 15% Final Grade= 2/3 Class Standing + 1/3 ME
Projects ------------------------------ 30% CLASS STANDING
Learning Outputs ------------------- 40%
Midterm/Final Exams --------------- 100% MAJOR EXAM
Classroom Policies Submission of all requirements is on or before the deadline.
Oral reports to assigned topics are requirements over and above other requirements.
Participation and involvement in laboratory activities strictly observed.
Attendance to classes and field of work should strictly monitored.

Comments/Suggestions: Please fill in the space provided for the improvement of this course syllabus in the next revision.

A. STUDENT
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________.

B. DEAN/SUPERVISOR
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________.

Prepared and Submitted by:

MARIA FATIMA C. PERALES, M.Ed. ECE


Course Facilitator

Reviewed and Approved by the Curriculum Committee:

Chairman: ______________________
Members: ______________________
______________________

Approved for use:

________________________
Dean/VP for Academic Affairs

You might also like