Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 136 views

    Example-Design and Inv SQR FTG

    Uploaded by

    Bryle Steven Newton
    The document investigates the design of two square footings to support columns. Both designs are checked for punching shear and beam shear using NSCP 2015 code. The first footing has dimensions of 2.6m x 2.6m and supports a 500mm column. It is reinforced with 12 bars and has an effective depth of 350mm. Both the punching shear and beam shear checks show the design is safe. The second footing has dimensions of 2.45m x 2.45m and supports a 380mm column. It is reinforced with 8 bars and has an effective depth of 300mm. Again, both the punching shear and beam shear checks indicate the design is adequate.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Example-Design and Inv SQR FTG

    Uploaded by

    Bryle Steven Newton
    136 views6 pages
    The document investigates the design of two square footings to support columns. Both designs are checked for punching shear and beam shear using NSCP 2015 code. The first footing has dimensions of 2.6m x 2.6m and supports a 500mm column. It is reinforced with 12 bars and has an effective depth of 350mm. Both the punching shear and beam shear checks show the design is safe. The second footing has dimensions of 2.45m x 2.45m and supports a 380mm column. It is reinforced with 8 bars and has an effective depth of 300mm. Again, both the punching shear and beam shear checks indicate the design is adequate.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    example-design and inv sqr ftg

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document investigates the design of two square footings to support columns. Both designs are checked for punching shear and beam shear using NSCP 2015 code. The first footing has dimensions of 2.6m x 2.6m and supports a 500mm column. It is reinforced with 12 bars and has an effective depth of 350mm. Both the punching shear and beam shear checks show the design is safe. The second footing has dimensions of 2.45m x 2.45m and supports a 380mm column. It is reinforced with 8 bars and has an effective depth of 300mm. Again, both the punching shear and beam shear checks indicate the design is adequate.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    136 views6 pages

    Example-Design and Inv SQR FTG

    Uploaded by

    Bryle Steven Newton
    The document investigates the design of two square footings to support columns. Both designs are checked for punching shear and beam shear using NSCP 2015 code. The first footing has dimensions of 2.6m x 2.6m and supports a 500mm column. It is reinforced with 12 bars and has an effective depth of 350mm. Both the punching shear and beam shear checks show the design is safe. The second footing has dimensions of 2.45m x 2.45m and supports a 380mm column. It is reinforced with 8 bars and has an effective depth of 300mm. Again, both the punching shear and beam shear checks indicate the design is adequate.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 6

    DESIGN OF SQUARE FOOTING

    (INVESTIGATION)
    1. Investigate, a square footing has 500mm x 500mm column and
    has 2.6m x 2.6m dimension of the footing and the effective
    depth of 350mm, concrete cover of 75mm is reinforced by 12-
    20mm diameter bars. Check for Punching Shear and Beam Shear.
    Using NSCP 2015. Assume fy = 276 MPa and f’c = 21 MPa.

    Data Given:
    c = 500 mm Nb = 12 bars cc = 75 mm
    B = 2.6 m db = 20 mm fy = 276 MPa
    L = 2.6 m d = 350 mm f’c = 21 MPa

    Solution:
    Solve for the steel area, As:
    As = NAb
    where,

    Ab = π⁄4 (db)2

    Ab = π⁄4 (20)2 = 314.159 mm2

    As = (12)(314.159 mm2)
    As = 3769.908 mm2
    Solve for the steel ratio, 𝜌:
    As 3769.908
    ρ= = =0.004142756044
    bd (2600)(350)

    Solve for 𝜔:
    ρfy (0.004142756044)(276)
    ω= =
    f'c 21
    ω= 0.05444765086
    Solve for the moment, Mu:

    Mu= ∅f' cbd2 ω(1-0.59ω)


    Mu=(0.90)(21)(2600)(350)2 (0.05444765086)(1-0.59(0.05444765086))
    Mu = 317.227 kN-m

    Solve for the net soil pressure using Actual Moment, qu:
    M
    qu= 2 ;
    L(Lm2 )

    L-c 2.6 - 0.50


    where, Lm = = = 1.05 m
    2 2
    317.227
    qu= (1.05)2
    (2.6)[ ]
    2

    qu = 221.334 kPa

    Check for Punching Shear:

    Vup=qu(L2 -(c+d)2 )
    Vup=(221.334)(2.62 -(0.50+0.35)2 )
    Vup = 1336.304 kN

    Vup
    Vactual =
    ∅bod

    where,

    bo = 4(c+d) = 4(0.50+0.35) = 3.4 m


    1336.304
    Vactual = ; ∅ = 0.75 (NSCP 2015)
    (0.75)(3.4)(0.35)

    Vactual = 1497.259 kPa

    √f'c √21
    Vallowable= = =1527.525 kPa
    3 3

    Vactual < Vallowable therefore, the design is SAFE.


    Check for Wide Beam Shear:
    Vub=quLx
    where
    L - c 2.60 - 0.50
    x= -d= - 0.35 = 0.70 m
    2 2

    Vub=(221.334)(2.60)(0.70)
    Vub = 402.828 kN

    Vub
    Vactual =
    ∅bd
    402.828
    Vactual =
    (0.75)(2.6)(0.35)

    Vactual = 590.224 kPa

    √f'c √21
    Vallowable= = = 763.763 kPa
    6 6

    Vactual < Vallowable therefore, the design is SAFE.


    2. Investigate, a square footing has 380mm x 380mm column and
    has 2.45m x 2.45m dimension of the footing and the effective
    depth of 300mm, concrete cover of 70mm is reinforced by 8-
    20mm diameter bars. Check for Punching Shear and Beam Shear.
    Using NSCP 2015. Assume fy = 276 MPa and f’c = 21 MPa.

    Data Given:
    c = 380 mm Nb = 8 bars cc = 70 mm
    B = 2.45 m db = 20 mm fy = 276 MPa
    L = 2.45 m d = 300 mm f’c = 21 MPa

    Solution:
    Solve for the steel area, As:
    As = NAb
    Where,
    Ab = π⁄4 (db)2

    Ab = π⁄4 (20)2 = 314.159 mm2

    As = (8)(314.159 mm2)
    As = 2513.272 mm2
    Solve for the steel ratio, 𝜌:
    As 2513.272
    ρ= = = 0.003419417687
    bd (2450)(300)

    Solve for 𝜔:
    ρfy (0.003419417687)(276)
    ω= =
    f'c 21

    ω= 0.04494091817
    Solve for the moment, Mu:

    Mu= ∅f' cbd2 ω(1-0.59ω)


    Mu=(0.90)(21)(2450)(300)2 (0.04494091817)(1-0.59(0.04494091817))
    Mu = 182.323 kN-m
    Solve for the net soil pressure using Actual Moment, qu:
    M L-c 2.45 - 0.38
    qu= Lm2
    ; where, Lm = = = 1.035 m
    L( 2 ) 2 2

    182.323
    qu= (1.035)2
    (2.45)[ ]
    2

    qu = 138.939 kPa

    Check for Punching Shear:

    Vup=qu(L2 -(c+d)2 )
    Vup=(138.939)(2.452 -(0.38+0.30)2 )
    Vup = 769.736 kN

    Vup
    Vactual =
    ∅bod

    Where,
    bo = 4(c+d) = 4(0.38+0.30) = 2.72 m
    769.736
    Vactual = ; ∅ = 0.75 (NSCP 2015)
    (0.75)(2.72)(0.30)

    Vactual = 1257.739 kPa

    √f'c √21
    Vallowable= = = 1527.525 kPa
    3 3

    Vactual < Vallowable therefore, the design is SAFE.

    Check for Wide Beam Shear:


    Vub=quLx
    Where
    L - c 2.45 - 0.38
    x= -d= - 0.30 = 0.735 m
    2 2

    Vub=(138.939)(2.45)(0.735)
    Vub = 250.194 kN
    Vub
    Vactual =
    ∅bd
    250.194
    Vactual =
    (0.75)(2.45)(0.30)

    Vactual = 453.867 kPa

    √f'c √21
    Vallowable = = = 763.763 kPa
    6 6

    Vactual < Vallowable therefore, the design is SAFE.

    You might also like